The roads sucked hard back then. A fast car would have been pointless. But there wasn't anything wrong with the propulsion technology. One of the cars mentioned in the linked article averaged 57 mph over a mile course, so it would have been rather more than that measured instantaneously at maximum speed.
We call those things white dwarfs, and they are quite bright. Eventually, they'll become black dwarfs, but the Universe isn't nearly old enough yet.
So you're saying that all you "normal" people are really relationship experts? Lots of people have relationship
problems, and a helpful tip or two might be the deciding factor in marginal cases. Even if your relationship is a happy one, who wouldn't want to grab some low hanging fruit (snickersnack!) and pump it up a notch?
Thumbing your nose at free (possibly useful) advice concerning as aspect of your life you presumably care about sounds like maladjusted behavior to me!
In Soviet Russia, the gov't wants YOU to use free/libre software!
I don't see where hybrids help here. The whole point is to use a smaller, more efficient engine, then add extra juice from the batteries at peak demand. Aircraft don't vary in their power demand by much once they get to cruising altitude. I didn't see this explained, but I've just started reading the links.
Maybe they save up a little juice and use it to help with taking off with the next flight? Short on details.
Hydrogen can be stored and converted to electricity when you need it.
This is in fact, precisely one of the bigger challenges with Hydrogen as an energy storage/delivery medium. It's not so easy to store it, or pipe it over long distances. Its molecules are so tiny that they diffuse through almost anything, leaking out and embrittling the tank or pipe in the process.
It's so hard making a tent that works right. This'd be just the thing to keep the glare off!
"Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal." - Zaphod Beeblebrox in "Hithiker's Guide to the Galaxy"