I tend to agree. I've use all the options mentioned. I am not a normal user though, and happened to run across the projects you mention. They all seem to work best via word of mouth.
The problem is, if all these get installed in the base, do I have an option to NOT install them?
And how far will this go? Should MS be forced to include 5 competing browsers, music, video apps? How about notepad and wordpad?
In MS's position, they are selling a ready to go for most peoples use OS. A lot of people appreciate not having to make choices and just having something that works out of the box. You start bundling all these things together and soon people will complain about bloat, the less effectiveness of there smaller hard drives they bought to save money, and who knows what else.
If you want to compete in a market, you have to actually do something besides just release a binary/source. You have to market it, get your name out there. Opera's flaw has been marketing imo. Besides bundling IE, what has MS done to block Opera on the desktop? We aren't talking Java here, or various other tech's that MS crippled from working.
Bottom line, I don't want all the excess bundle, and wouldn't mind a selection of apps to choose from during install time, but don't force them on me in a default install.
I'm a FreeBSD/OpenBSD user myself with an XP box for gaming still so I am not MS biased as I predominantly use BSD's because I prefer the openess of the arch, and a base install is really just that. A base set of tools to get where I need to for what I want. But mom and pop just want it to plug in and get online.