Reader h11:6 points out news of a recent study which suggests that "Android's open source nature will give it a boost over Apple's iPhone," and thus take the lead in sales as soon as three years from now.
You can find a study that will say just about anything. If Andriod sales overtake iPhone sales it'll be because it's a better phone that provides the average consumer with a better experience than the iPhone presently offers. The average consumer could care less about the development model of the apps that you can download on a phone. They don't even know what that means.
Apple's biggest weakness isn't it's app development model. It is it's exclusive contract with AT&T. As soon as that's over, watch out. I know a ton of people who want an iPhone but they either can't or won't switch to AT&T in order to get one.
This could be a public relations disaster in the making for Netflix.
Since most Netflix members still use the service to watch DVD's I highly doubt it.
So they wan to help laid off workers, just not their own laid off workers?
Microsoft Bungles Severance, Asks Laid Off Workers for Money Back
How Microsoft-esque
Should we bring back everything popular from eight years ago? How about floppy discs? Some things should be left in the past. Emailing pictures to people is more sensible than MMS.
Except that not everybody has an e-mail address. Several close friends of mine either don't have an e-mail address or don't check their e-mail often. All of them have cell phones with MMS. The "e-mail it" approach is candy ass. There shouldn't be anything that a free cellphone (given to you by the cell phone company when you sign a contract) can do that the iPhone can not do.
The original iPhone has been out for almost two years now. I can understand that they'd give a higher priority to shoring up the OS, getting a 3G version out there and then putting out an SDK, but IMO after that their priority should be filling in some of the holes in functionality. It's ridiculous that things like the ability to forward text messages, MMS, and copy and paste are still missing from the iPhone almost two years after it has been released.
Is it supposed to be surprising that they didn't rewrite their entire codebase for every new OS release?!? Obviously Windows 7 is going to be built on top of the Vista codebase, that's how almost every software release works. Usually if a company decides to rewrite a program from the ground up (see: Adobe from time to time), the rewritten version is less featureful, less stable, and takes much longer to come out than the previous version.
Yes but when it comes to OS's in the long run it's beyond worth it. See OS X. It's time for Microsoft to abandon the Windows code base and re-write Windows from the ground up. Build virtualization right into the OS for those who need backward compatibility. Oh and they should have no more than 3 versions. A home version, a business version and a server version. I'd prefer only one that could do it all but this is Microsoft we're talking about. If they are smart they'll eliminate bloat within the company first. The amount of bureaucracy is laughable and if they don't do that first a re-wright from the ground up will take as long to produce as Duke Nukem Forever.
If I did have a nuclear bomb, I would not have a problem. Some other folks would have a problem.
Signed,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
After the last of 16 mounting screws has been removed from an access cover, it will be discovered that the wrong access cover has been removed.