Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Fairly clear (Score 4, Insightful) 144

Reason has no responsibility to police its comments, so the govt leaning on them won't push them to do so. It could send a chilling effect among internet commenters, but only if people knew about it, so what was the gag for?

The point is to abuse Reason with legal process so that they shut down their comments sections, eliminating a forum for people who generally disapprove of government power. Also, naturally, to terrorize commenters and make them all think twice about communicating this disapproval in public.

Comment Re:Say Good By to the Rainforests .... (Score 1) 851

Apixieism has no tradition, stories of faith, or organizational structure (things a religion usually requires), but it is an expression of pure faith. Apixieism might even be considered the ultimate faith: it is defined by a negative, which means it can never be proven true. Never being proven true means it must always be taken on faith. There are no witnesses to apixieism . No prophets or mystics with direct experience of the lack of the divine.

Comment Re:Technically, they are correct. (Score 1) 165

"Respect for, and adherence to the rule of law is the premise upon which the United States was founded, and it has been a cornerstone of my Presidency."

      - Barack H Obama, President of the USA, 2015-04-30

The Dear Leader is a great comedian too! All Hail The One!

Comment Re:Can you say... (Score 1) 266

...overturned on Appeal?

I'm sorry, that's just an insane ruling. REQUIRING a company to manufacture a specific product???

Oh no, that's not crazy. The crazy thing that will never be allowed is for people to be free to purchase the drug from any producer in the world that wants to provide it. Freedom is just crazy talk.

Controlling companies benefitting from a legally protected market is entirely predictable.

Comment Re:Nope... Nailed It (Score 1) 186

Vague specs are bad. But.. there is little I hate more than when they go the other route and try to fill in all the techical details. I've received a lot of specs that already included things like database schema complete with really bad table implementations and duplicated data all over the place.

The worst is no specs but a halfway implementation that self contradictory. "Here, implement this." There's no way to fill in the blanks and make it work, but if you change anything, it's "But I gave you the implementation!".

Slashdot Top Deals

All power corrupts, but we need electricity.

Working...