I didn't want to bring up gun control per se, but rather in keeping with the spirit of TFA, I suggest that this:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
is pretty darn ambiguous, and had the founders run it through a test phase whereby people could have asked (as beta tester might have asked the developers), "umm, what does the first part of the sentence have to do with the second?" We could thereby have avoided having the Supremes try to decipher what the hell the authors were thinking.
The whole school of "Strict Constructionism," as it is commonly used, whereby the justices try to ascertain what the original intent of the authors was, might be rendered moot if we really could test drive a law and see how it works in practice.
But it would never work, as many of the philophers here point out, the Law of Unintended Consequences remains the law of the land.
Interestingly enough:The case forces the court to reconsider the line between a student's right to free expression and a principal's authority to limit what is said and done at school.
The message seemed designed to provoke Principal Deborah Morse, and it succeeded in doing so. She tore it down and sent Frederick to the office. She planned to suspend him for five days, but when he invoked Thomas Jefferson and the First Amendment, she doubled the suspension to 10 days.
Several religious-rights groups filed briefs supporting the student's free-speech right in this case. Their lawyers worry that school officials might, for example, say it was inappropriate for a student to wear a T-shirt that praised Jesus Christ.
"Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal." - Zaphod Beeblebrox in "Hithiker's Guide to the Galaxy"