Comment Re:Still using it (Score 1, Troll) 155
Hands down, Eclipse was the slowest and most confusingest I've ever used out of ALL of the above.
I put a backwards mirror over mine so they thought I was spying on them.
LOL, whoever wrote this is a genius.
1. Being dynamic
LOL.
Works great till you realize the USA is currently worse than a third-world country in terms of broadband penetration and up/down speeds...
Sorry, have you been to any third world countries? In many you're lucky if you can get dial-up speeds, yet alone a constant connection.
It all depends on the quality of the existing code base. More often than not, it's better to start from scratch.
No, no, no, NO it's not. Do your research. Starting from scratch will end up taking you just as much time. Refactor, clean up and fix.
Since my financial stability for the future doesn't correlate with income nor even profit, I think my risk is pretty low. Even if volatility continues, and even if my businesses took in 50% of their revenues in BTC, I still wouldn't see any actual harm. The businesses have been around for decades, and they're self-sufficient and stable.
Converting BTC to fiat currency puts a sell-pressure on BTC. Holding BTC would reduce the selling supply, thereby reducing volatility from the sell side. It's the same with dollars: I hoard my dollars in cash "under the mattress" rather than put it in a bank to get loaned out as debt (money multiplier effect).
The "market forces" in BTC right now are pretty unique because only a small number of BTC holders are actually transacting. Most people are "long game speculators", and are neither buying things with BTC nor selling it to liquidate for fiat currency. As the number of BTC users goes up (which will likely happen when volatility is reduced), I believe we'll see a more stable platform.
I'd be happy to throw back just to the 1800s or so -- when poor people could actually save their way to wealth, where credit addiction didn't lead to thrill-seeking behavior addiction, and where the money supply wasn't a medium to fund warfare and welfare entitlements benefiting the rich and powerful.
Business regulations, money regulations and savings dilution aren't modern in any way, but they've become the norm. I'd rather see all 3 go away, or at least just become part of the nanny-state economy, not my economies.
A computer scientist is someone who fixes things that aren't broken.