Comment Re:Why the hell is this here? (Score 1) 249
nah, topic is just titled wrong. should be "Worlds unemployment in critical levels. People going mad from running out of all useless things to do in their spare unemployed time"
nah, topic is just titled wrong. should be "Worlds unemployment in critical levels. People going mad from running out of all useless things to do in their spare unemployed time"
fallacy indeed
even chaos theory is too uniform to describe my consciousness.
heh, if this is not customizable then i don't know what is;) i can only imagine what everything people will think of for extensions.
http://www.webupd8.org/search/label/gnome%20shell?max-results=10
http://blog.fpmurphy.com/
ok, that has to be either worst joke ever or lame attempt at trying to post serious troll comment.
if anything... shell is abso-fucking-most configurable desktop ever. you can extend/change abso-fucking-lutely everything with simple javascript. granted, since g3 was just released, not many extensions are present yet and gnome-shell by it self is not really feature rich environment and neither was any other desktop when they switched release. moving from gnome 1 to 2 was especially terrible. old and new gtk worked and looked differently, one had utf8, other didn't... same troubles at kde camp from 3 to 4. c'mon developers need to sleep too and if they wait to release full featured version without period of change they'd need to support 2 versions.
if anything, work like that really deserves benefit of a doubt until 3.2 or 3.4. people making extensions might surprise you. just google on how to make extensions and see how brilliant it is. and yes, i do love shell... after i installed places extension and made 3 extensions for my self i can really say i was never so productive
As for calling XP's firewall a firewall..
based on lack of features and being inbound only, this car analogy kinda fits it
"BEST CAR IN UNIVERSE!!!!! only missing 3 tires and there is no engine, but do not fear... space where you can put your own engine is intact and perfectly cleaned. also, sits and wheel can be be included with additional purchase, as special feature mirrors were cleaned daily"
and yes, you can from early iptables start, which predates any firewall presence in windows.
you can set rulesets in specific tables, you can add/remove them dynamically, save/restore from the very first time of iptables replacing ipchains, which already had that feature too.
the only way you could get same feature was using zonealarm (except zonealarm didn't close port after application stopped). and before answering, read right documentation, not the blurb this author wrote
no need to get upset. author just worded it really badly. as most already said, iptables already had add/remove/save/restore, although i can see you get bonner every time you mention openbsd
here is how this works
- service/program starts and sends d-bus message "hey, i need xxx port to work (yes, i really meant classic pr0n port;)
- user gets prompted and needs to validate decision trough authentication.
- port is open
- when software stops, it sends another d-bus message "close pr0n port"
- port is closed
this is not scenario which would be usable in any server environment. but for n00b user running something... might just be life saver not to get confused with bunch of for him too advanced howtos.
Can please someone explain me what's wrong with appending and deleting a firewall rule:
sorry, couldn't resist
$ iptables-restre
should be
$ iptables-restore
if they eat hamburgers to be americans... what does this say about vegetarians? are they cow wannabies?
hah, it does. and all it would took to avoid was saying "i firmly believe in natural selection where stronger survives. therefore i can't see why anyone would be punished for following natural laws". definitely wouldn't be chosen by prosecution.
by far easiest to calculate is 60/100. more than enough accurate. since car speeds are in those numbers
hearing sony and identity protection in same sentence after all what happened => one can only be sarcastic
this news should be posted on April 1st
wrong link in copy/paste. sorry for that
it seems you missed the point i tried to show. it wasn't to blame microsoft for anything. just patent nonsense and inability to discover which patent is actual invention and which one is not (either by prior art or triviality where simple life occurrence was presented in the code form). main problem being that people in patent office don't even understand what they are granting patent for (missed in 99.99% in software)
not software ones, but i liked these very much
invention of
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=hhYJAAAAEBAJ&dq=6,360,693
one man going as far as this
http://www.ipmenu.com/archive/AUI_2001100012.pdf
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/07/02/australia.wheel/
http://www.google.si/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=trivial+patents search should be better link than my ramblings how nothing works in this department
Pascal is not a high-level language. -- Steven Feiner