Comment I can only confirm this. (Score 1) 561
Steve Reich and Philipp Glass as drugs? Well, I must be honest to the
Oh wait! This ticklish effect in my brain is called "music"? Oh wooowwww
Steve Reich and Philipp Glass as drugs? Well, I must be honest to the
Oh wait! This ticklish effect in my brain is called "music"? Oh wooowwww
2010: "The Internet is dead"
The Artist Formerly Known as Prince
2040: "Prince is dead".
The Network Formerly Known as The Internet
Now if you are in Spam, hijack a system in Korea to send spam to China, where should you be liable?
You've answered your own question: See Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984)..
Unless the code of law in USA takes precedence over the whole world (which a lot of people from the aforementioned country tend to think), jurisprudence in USA won't hitch the back of anyone in Korea, China, or UK for the matter...
Which, in the U.S., it rarely is.
All very true. Worse is exchanges like:
"I'll have the main dish, but can I have half portion, I won't finish it, it's way too big"
"Ah...hum, sir we don't do that"
"But I'll pay full price anyway"
Baffled lookBut sir, we can't do that...
Apparently, at least in US, it's close to impossible to have a cook who can divide by 2...
well, how may airliners that take off from Israel have been hijacked since the 70's?
The exact same ratio of airliners being hijacked from Israel in average each year, compared to the rest of the world. It is just that hijacking planes is not the preferred method anymore. I guess it's too risky/complicated a business compared to planting a bomb. Oh, plus progress in airport security everywhere?
The Tel-Aviv airport is irrelevant here and I don't think Israel has anything to show off in terms of 'security'. Besides, they hijack boats in international waters and kill people on board...at least with Tsahal, airliners are safe as long as they focus on civilian ships.
Frankly, wrong example here...
What you advocate here is arbitrary detention of people based on no other evidence than their faces. Using a technique that has not proven to work, and worse, that is being proven that it doesn't work.
Judging people on their faces has never lead to good things. And there is no way to do it 'correctly'.
This whole SPOT thing is again a demonstration of how american people is gullible and how authorities have absolutely no capacity to think before acting. It's not the only thing left.
Plus, on a personal note, I'd rather fly a plane with a 1/1000000000 chance for it to blow off rather than being under permanent suspicion and scrutiny while I spend my time in airports waiting for delayed flights because one of those TSA 'officer' screwed up - again.
Honestly? Enough with this circus show, let's get back to normal life and stop being paranoid while cultivating our ignorance in a state of security bliss.
Slashdot, you borked the governmentation with the help of the intertubes!
Shame on you, you insensitive clods!
does this story warrant inclusion on slashdot?
Just for the unusually large amount of really funny comments, the answer is YES.
It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White