The Germans produced less than 1350 of the legendary Tiger tank, and less than 500 of the King Tiger). I think we saw how that turned out for the Germans. Americans and Russians just kept churning out Shermans and T-34's, and simply overwhelmed them.
Is a lot more complex than that, dont forget the Panther family and all the different tank destroyers that they employed. Fuel was in many ways the deciding factor, with enough fuel the Germans could have held out for maybe three or four months more. The Battle of the Bulge for instance might have gone quite differently if the German commander had had enough fuel.
Im a teacher by profession and here in Sweden this entire debate would be a non-starter. Why ? Because our curriculae are designed in a completely different way. We have a national curriculum set by the Riksdag (parliament) but thats designed by teachers and experts in concert. I have just participated in the evaluation of the new Science curriculum, a very interesting process where we get a say in what the focus should be.
In addition, our curriculae do not specify in mindnumbing detail what kids should learn, that is left up to us professionals. Quite a contrast from the standards that I saw when I visited schools in Virginia and Maryland last year. Of course, our kind of curriculum has its own challenges. Oh, and we get to choose our textbooks freely as well. We can pick whatever we find to be good books, regardless of what some well-meaning nutcase thinks.
As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison