Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Is this really how fighter jets work? (Score 1) 613

The Germans produced less than 1350 of the legendary Tiger tank, and less than 500 of the King Tiger). I think we saw how that turned out for the Germans. Americans and Russians just kept churning out Shermans and T-34's, and simply overwhelmed them.

Is a lot more complex than that, dont forget the Panther family and all the different tank destroyers that they employed. Fuel was in many ways the deciding factor, with enough fuel the Germans could have held out for maybe three or four months more. The Battle of the Bulge for instance might have gone quite differently if the German commander had had enough fuel.

Comment Re:US abuse (Score 1) 966

Yes, just like in many other countries all over the world (including the US) lots of people were quite impressed by Germany and its martial and socioeconomical prowess in the thirties/early forties. Sweden had strong ties to Germany and German culture. Germany was and is an important trade partner. Add to that the fact that quite a few German divisions were based in occupied Norway and Denmark, the Soviet aggression against Finland in 1939 and well, its not hard to understand that Sweden preferred to stay out of the war if possible. Fear of a German invasion and of a strong Soviet Union played its part . There was and is a great deal of post facto shame about the iron ore sales and the transiting of German troops but also some relief that we managed to keep out of the war.

Comment Re:Richard Feynman on textbooks (Score 1) 1238

Im a teacher by profession and here in Sweden this entire debate would be a non-starter. Why ? Because our curriculae are designed in a completely different way. We have a national curriculum set by the Riksdag (parliament) but thats designed by teachers and experts in concert. I have just participated in the evaluation of the new Science curriculum, a very interesting process where we get a say in what the focus should be.

In addition, our curriculae do not specify in mindnumbing detail what kids should learn, that is left up to us professionals. Quite a contrast from the standards that I saw when I visited schools in Virginia and Maryland last year. Of course, our kind of curriculum has its own challenges. Oh, and we get to choose our textbooks freely as well. We can pick whatever we find to be good books, regardless of what some well-meaning nutcase thinks.

Earth

Gas Wants To Kill the Wind 479

RABarnes writes "Scientific American has posted an article about the political efforts of natural gas and electric utilities to limit the growth of wind-generated electricity. Although several of the points raised by the utilities and carbon-based generators are valid, the basic driver behind their efforts is that wind-generation has now successfully penetrated the wholesale electricity market. Wind was okay until it became a meaningful competitor to the carbon dioxide-producing entities. Among the valid points raised by the carbon-based generators are concerns about how the cost of electricity transmission are allocated and how power quality can be improved (wind generation — from individual sites — is hopelessly variable). But there are fixes for all of the concerns raised by the carbon-based entities and in almost all cases they have been on the other side of the question in the past."

Slashdot Top Deals

As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison

Working...