Comment Just stupid (Score 1) 216
From TFS:
"We find no reason to conclude that cellphone users lack facts about the functions of cell towers or about telephone providers' recording cell tower usage."
In other words, we assert you probably know your privacy is being violated by existing technical means, so we'll just ignore the obvious constitutional instructions about warrants when dealing with personal information -- whereabouts, in this instance. Because the constitution is abused and/or ignored by most judges now, so that's ok, right? RIGHT?
Let's say some people commit murder in parks. Because they do. So, using the "reasoning" of the utter morons in this court:
We find no reason to conclude that park users lack facts about the prevalence of murder in parks.
And therefore, it's perfectly ok. Mr. Murderer, go forth and murder some more. Next Case!