[...] language proficiency at this level of journalism just doesn't exist any longer - it seems to be whoever is willing to type up copy and charge less than an AI for it will get the job.
Perhaps you mean an em-dash rather than a hyphen there, and you
I think Archangel Michael was thinking more of people like Al Gore. https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem....
If I had become world-famous for warning that the seas are going to rise and drown us all, I probably wouldn't invest heavily in expensive property right next to the sea.
Cute link! Any article containing "Climatard" is definitely a winner.
Is three miles away across nearly sea-level ground "right next to the sea"? Is something on a 200-foot-high cliff that rises nearly vertically from the ocean? Perhaps both are. But one is going to be flooded far, far before the other one is.
The poster is probably pronouncing "Giga" with a soft-g (as in the Greek, and the movie referred to), and then messing up the spelling and quantity.
You do know that Sunday and Monday are different days, right?
Yeah! He'd surely make the planes run on time! *cough*
That's delightfully confusing. Best? Worst? One of the chances, anyway! Nicely done.
[...]should be afraid of and beet.
Are you saying they should be rooted out?
But most school's don't teach the mainframe programming language COBOL any more [...]
Do most schools teach about when to use apostrophes?
People working with a niche tech universally chose to work with that tech [...]
Nope. It would be a valid point you make with the rest of the comment, but this assumption kills it.
So, we deal with it. I live pretty far north, and close to the largest body of freshwater on the planet. I’ll be fine.
Near Lake Baikal, eh?
Ohhhh. You mean by *area*.
Is everything *you* do for only money or publication credit? Those are not the only reasons *I* do things.
So, yes?
Isn't Kelvin quoted in your link as saying airplanes are impossible because, implicitly, the science of thermodynamics prohibits it?
I don't see how that interview implies a thermodynamic limit of any sort to heavier-than-air flight. If you know of other writings or even tangential implications from Lord Kelvin's statements that talk about such things, please let me know!
21 was using Shor's algorithm, and the team reporting that realized they'd factored larger numbers in the process. Pre-processing is arguably a bit of a "cheat", and of course there are groups which take credit for some snake-oily results, but the fact remains that prime factorization is coming along. You imply that it's only because of money and academic credit involved, which is really a silly claim to make.
Well, as of three years ago, it was 1099551473989, not 21. Please update your memory.
No.
Thompson had a lot of strong opinions, and they weren't always correct, but he knew about birds, he knew about energy densities, and he knew about the developments of 1896 and heavier-than-air flying machines.
Perhaps you're thinking about https://zapatopi.net/kelvin/pa...
"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds
