Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:More laws is not the answe (Score 1) 1006

when you punish the law abiding to stop criminals, it usually has the exact opposite effect

Prohibition in the 20s to stop alcohol lead to the rise of the mafia

Pseudoephedrine restrictions lead to more (and stronger) meth coming in from Mexico

Strict gun laws in Chicago leads to it having the highest gun crime rate in the USA

Most recent massacres have taken place in "Gun Free" zones

Comment Re:I Don't Care About the Physical Game Itself (Score 3, Insightful) 1006

oh the good old musket argument... well lets be sure to hold the 1st amendment to the same standard ... technology available at the time of the writing of the 1st amendment Typewriters? Nope! Video games? Nope! Movies? Nope! Internet? Nope! Recorded voice/music? Nope! Television? Nope! Telephone? Nope! By your lame argument, the founding fathers never could have foreseen a world with that kind of technology so it is not protected under the 1st amendment either.

Comment Re:The Stupidity, It Hurts! (Score 4, Insightful) 1006

"if you want to talk about restricting and banning things, look at the actual tools that he actually used to succeed in carrying out this horrible crime."

Ah yes, you don't like your inanimate object blamed, so you want to push the blame off on some other inanimate object.

How about we just blame the person?

Comment not all Bush's fault (Score 5, Informative) 456

though its fun and all to blame Bush for Iraq, all you have to do is look back a year or so before he got into office and see that Clinton, Albright, Kerry, Berger, Pelosi and more were pounding those drums as well...

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California), Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq, December 16, 1998

"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff. February 17, 1998

"The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of his region, the security of the world. The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people." President Clinton, Oval Office Address to the American People, December 16, 1998

  "Imagine the consequences if Saddam fails to comply and we fail to act. Saddam will be emboldened, believing the international community has lost its will. He will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. And some day, some way, I am certain, he will use that arsenal again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, President Clinton's National Security Advisor, Town Hall Meeting on Iraq at Ohio State University, February 18, 1998

"No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators." Madeleine Albright, President Clinton's Secretary of State, Town Hall Meeting on Iraq at Ohio State University, February 18, 1998

Comment Re:A/C and heat (Score 1) 466

2 summers ago, I turned my AC to 80 while I was at work, when I got home I turned it back to 72, the house never seemed to cool back off.

Last summer, I had to keep the AC at 72 because someone was home all the time...

The difference? I saved $100.00 a month by keeping the AC at a steady 72 and the house stayed cool... (and a lower cooling bill means I was using less electricity)

Slashdot Top Deals

I think there's a world market for about five computers. -- attr. Thomas J. Watson (Chairman of the Board, IBM), 1943

Working...