My wife and I would look after each other until we no longer could, at which point we would put ourselves in a home.
How would having kids just so they could take care of us be any better? That seems like a real dick move.
Who is going to staff this "home"? Other 80 and 90 year olds? Or other people's kids and grandkids?
The grandparent post overstated the case, because of course there's no need for everyone to have their own kids to look after them when they're old. But we still need young people to follow us. So it's perfectly fine for lots of people to choose to be "evolutionary dead ends", as long as not everyon makes that choice.
That's assuming that we know how the story will end. It won't necessarily end that way.
I agree.
I think I'm missing something here in this discussion. Signing a petition is a way of saying that *I* support this, it's a way of taking a public stand on the issue. That's why you sign your *name*, instead of ticking a box anonymously. That's also why petitions are, at least in theory, taken seriously -- it's not an anonymous mob who support the petition, it's a bunch of specific people who are willing to put their names on record.
Sometimes I think that if they did nothing, that might be a GOOD thing
Just as a by-the-way, "apologist" does not mean what you seem to think it does.
"Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem in this country without having a 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, talk.politics.misc