The activists have an agenda, to force these fictional people we call businesses to do something they normally would not, But it's at least one that is not a step above criminal intent to defraud their customers. In my opinion that's an agenda that a rational customer should support.
The definition of 'worked' is different before Net Neutrality, during and after.
That is the point of the telecom lobby buying the chairman of the FCC: change the meaning of words to suit the marketing department's needs.
Yes, 5mbps is 'high speed Internet' in America. Just like it was in 1997. Last century.
IPv6, BGP security, last mile in urban areas and gigabit downlinks are all costs that you can sweep under the rug if you can define 'worked' to mean 'what ever I am willing to give you for your dollars.'
Unless we forget that at in the Twentieth Century, the Bell Telephone company required you to buy an expensive telephone from them to use the network they built through the common access areas on roads, sometimes with taxpayer money. If you let them graze their sheep on your land, you need to make sure they aren't charging you for it on top of the wool. Or they have really pulled that wool over your eyes.
Google built major facility nearby where I was renting for a while and ran 1Gbps fibre to the neighborhoods. It took almost no time, in government speed, for the regional phone company ISP to pay for laws restricting who can use it. They are actually so anti-competitive that if they sold bottled water, American telephone companies would seek to have your house plumbing outlawed because that water doesn't run through their pipes.