Comment Re:it always amazes me (Score 1) 341
I envy your overly-simplistic view on the world. The reality is that information relating to nuclear weapons has complicated and often-undefined and arbitrary secrecy policies behind it. Look at, for instance, the United States vs. The Progressive case. That was the first time that anyone had released specific information about thermonuclear weapons to the public. Government lawyers tried to censor it but the court ruled against them and allowed the magazine to publish. In a private session (the details of which aren't public), the lawyers on both sides actually shared a huge amount of highly classified information relating to bomb design. It was directly due to the results of this session that the court decided that what The Progressive was publishing was not damaging to US security, since no one seriously pursuing nuclear weapons would find anything new in the article that they didn't already know.
By the way, the US government still does not formally acknowledge the existence of the Teller-Ulam design, even though everyone knows about it at this point. Yet, many details of the Teller-Ulam design *have* been made public (for instance, the existence of a radiation channel, something that only makes sense in that design). It's a contradictory situation.