I am still curious how these self-driving cars deal with pedestrians, bicyclists, kids playing near the street, etc.

Of course, it can't be worse than distracted human drivers.

Consider anti-statism.

Is now a good time to bring this up again?

I am pretty sure they did not repeal 14th Amendment to the US Consitution.

But the Supreme Court has already ignored the Fourth Amendment. What's one more?

Where's Team Cringely?

Why would anyone look on YouTube for high-quality videos?

They are looking in the wrong place.

Is there anything the FBI does that does not subvert the 4th Amendment?

Thanks. I really miss the '80s now.

4.4 pounds

Is it really that hard to use the Metric system? Are Fox News consumers not savvy enough?

I wouldn't trust MADD either.

'We believe this might turn the car into the cure for the elimination of drunk driving,' says Laura Dean-Mooney, president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

The good news is that when drunk driving is eliminated, MADD will have nothing to do. (That's not really true, because MADD is trying to prevent alcohol consumption in instances that have nothing to do with driving, but it would force them to be honest about it.)

This feat is even more amazing than we first thought considering
all
Chinese
people
look
alike.

Not sure I want to drink in a bar at the end of any runway.

So, Fake Steve Jobs, you've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya punk?'"

If Fake Steve Jobs lives outside of California, who cares?

Thai people call foreigners "farang" (which also means "French").

The fundamental difference between the state and all other economic actors is that the state is (or rather can be) democratic, with everyone having a voice. So it is directly controlled by the populace, unlike corporations, and - properly implemented - can be trusted to operate in the interests of the society as a whole.

Every consumer can choose whether to buy products or services from any corporation or other individual. But you don't get that choice with the government. Try to stop paying for government services.

Then, of course, a regulating state breaking up monopolies is not itself a monopolist, since it does not own all the property, nor fully command it.

The regulating state is definitely a monopolist, since it has no competition.