Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Lasers are easy to stop (Score 1) 517

If your going to shoot the railgun the same way you shoot conventional guns what's the point?

The main point of a railgun is that you don't have to launch the payload with gunpowder, but with electricity. There are more safe and battle-field redundant means for electrical generation than the existing storage and transit requirements for gun-powder.

Even if they had the same mussel velocity.

Comment Re:More awkward learning social nicety in a pit (Score 1) 700

There are a lot of people who behave like they are still in high-school...

Since evidence suggests that "cliques" and "bullying" continues through university and into business** being exposed to it and learning to deal with it is likely an important life skill to be learned (similar to EQ, and perhaps arguably more important than academics). I'm not saying home schoolers (of which I know a few) can't learn these skills, but depending on your career aspirations, growing up in "tougher" environments can often be a formative learning experience for young folks.

They are more professional, less crass and boorish.

You say that like it's good to be professional all the time and bad to ever be crass and boorish. I guess to each his own, but personally, I would find a such a permanent professional veneer existence rather sterile and boring (even in the office)...

They don't attract notice except in passing to note someone seems strangely confident in themselves.

FWIW, confidence is a two edged sword. The risk with confidence, is over-confidence, and not knowing yourself. This in itself can benign in the form a comparative-optimism which can contribute to delusion that they are more likely (than average) to have good things happen to them and less likely (than average) to have bad things happen to them which often leads to a happier life. Or in the other extreme a Dunning-Kruger handicap throughout life. More confidence is not always better, but more self awareness generally doesn't hurt (too much, although can be depressing at times).

Sometimes it's hard to find out who you are and develop self-awareness when constantly in an environment created by your parents. I've seen that happen many times in my university (with both home schooled and highly sheltered children), since they weren't exposed to a more free-wheeling environment before, they we just discovering who they were when the consequences were much higher (if you want an analogy, not unlike getting the chicken pox early in life vs when you are an adult, or learning to drive for the first time on your playstation vs with a 1/2 ton steel box with seatbelts and airbags).

There is also some evidence that artificial confidence can be crippling for some children (e.g., forced to show artificial confidence, but knowing they are untested, some children are extra fragile when confronted with failure and develop coping strategies than can be self-defeating or even anti-social).

**They range from the more benign "lunch-invite-crowd", cafeteria table, smoke-break crew, to the more malignant country club good-old-boy variety and everything in between. Some folks just call this office politics to make it somehow sound more mature, but it's really just the same thing...

Comment Re:Going to University (Score 1) 700

Math education at most colleges don't have a single class in common with math majors.

Ouch, that's depressing.

One of my good friends is a junior high math teacher, and although this is somewhat true, it is a bit misleading.

One thing that I have found is that for a subject say like algebra or elementary set theory, there is a level of understanding you need to pass a class and another level of understanding to teach it to someone else that has a lower level of understanding than you do. Taking linear algebra and group theory classes letting algebra rust isn't then same as learning basic algebra and geometry more in depth augmented with a survey of linear algebra, statistics and leaving the group theory on the table.

As a personal anecdote, when I was in high school, I was pretty advanced in math so my math teach made me "help" teach math to some of the other students in the class. At the time, I somewhat resented this imposition, but when I got to university (and did some tutoring and TA work), I found that these exercises helped me learn this basic material much better than I would have just to get an 'A+' in the class (and forced me to develop more than one strategy to get people to understand these topics).

Comment Re:Where Apple failed, (Score 1) 98

Of course on the orange hand, Kyocera has low volume phones and their ceramics group makes their own sapphire, where Apple currently needs to contract to get access to sapphire manufacturing.

I suspect that won't change in the near future, but perhaps, eventually, Apple will attempt to get their sapphire coated glass idea manufactured at some point. I'm guessing that although they would undoubtedly like exclusivity, I don't think that will be in the cards following that whole GTAT fiasco, so they might have to suck it up and invest in their own production if they insist on that...

Comment Re:Brightness (Score 2) 67

They calculated that there are 5 planets orbiting the star by the way the intensity of the star dips very, very slightly in a pattern. Are we sure there are no other mechanisms that can cause the star's intensity to vary in a pattern? We only know about our own star's sunspots, and the longer term cycle (11 years) in which the sunspots change the intensity at which it emits. How do we know that a smaller, much older star doesn't have a sunspot type cycle that is shorter or more complex, and that is what is causing this star's intensity to change?

Please refer to the Kepler FAQ

Planetary transits have durations of a few hours to less than a day. The measured solar variability on this time scale is 1 part 100,000 (10 ppm) as compared to an Earth-size transit of 1 part in 12,000 (80 ppm). Even then, most of the variability is in the UV, which is excluded from the measurements by the Kepler Mission.

Also concerning stellar variablity...

Even for the Sun - a star of low rotation rate and relatively evenly distributed active regions (in longitude) - variability is concentrated at time scales comparable to the rotational period. Fortunately, the time scales of interest to planet detection are considerably shorter.

One would hope that we can have enough faith in our friends at Nasa that they would do their homework (rather than just surf a few sites on the internet before launching a 1/2 billion dollar mission)...

Comment Re:That's a lot of lifetimes (Score 3, Informative) 59

Sort of. Haley's comet only comes around every 75 years, so for most of us that's a once-in-a-lifetime thing.

However, there are oodles of asteroids and comets out there, so in general you will have plenty of opportunities in your lifetime to see some. So feel free to get some sleep tonight if you need to.

AFAIK, these things don't happen too often. The next big asteroid viewing opportunity is likely to be in 2027 when 1999-AN10 makes a near pass (and should be brighter than 2004-BL86). Although asteroid 2004-BL86 will revisit our neighborhood in 2050, it won't be as close as it will be tonight for another 200 years...

Comment Re:Plot synopsis (Score 1) 138

You forgot the plot point where Kirk seduces and makes love to some sexy 80's icon girl, creating a time paradox baby that grows up and can be used in #14.

Key scene in #14: Daughter confronts Kirk (his father) and, as the camera is zoomed close up to her face, Kaley Cuoco screams "DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD"

FTFY... Wouldn't be the first time a movie was inspired by a cheezy advert...

Comment Re:Mental note: (Score 4, Interesting) 180

Mental note: When establishing a questionably legal site for definitely illegal transactions to be made through, don't keep any logs about it, nor your conversations regarding it.

Observation: if you have a big enough ego to think you can create such a questionable site and get away with it, you have probably can't stop yourself from feeling invincible in whatever you do and dismiss any possibility that your logs will get compromised *ever*. Conversely, if have enough doubt about the eventual security of your logs in the event you might eventually get caught, you probably don't have the balls to go through with it in the first place...

Comment Re:Poor delusional old man (Score 1) 191

The U.S. patent law is federal law.

(Federal) Patent law does not address the ownership question, it simply grants patent rights to who the owner is. The actual ownership is an issue of contract law (or more specifically the imputed contract of employment between employer and employee). Although there are some federal legal issues in employment contracting (e.g., EEOC, minimum wage, working conditions, etc), most of the legal aspects of employment contract law is set by the states (e.g,. right to work, living wage, etc) and local rules which further restrict the federal rules. AFAIK, when patent ownership issues arise in federal courts, they are obliged to look at the applicable state statutes to make the ownership determination.

For example, in California (where silicon valley is), California Labor Code Section 2870 specifically prohibits employers from co-opting inventions made by employees except those made for hire.

2870. (a) Any provision in an employment agreement which provides that an employee shall assign, or offer to assign, any of his or her rights in an invention to his or her employer shall not apply to an invention that the employee developed entirely on his or her own time without using the employer's equipment, supplies, facilities, or trade secret information except for those inventions that either:
      (1) Relate at the time of conception or reduction to practice of the invention to the employer's business, or actual or demonstrably
anticipated research or development of the employer; or
      (2) Result from any work performed by the employee for the employer.
      (b) To the extent a provision in an employment agreement purports to require an employee to assign an invention otherwise excluded from being required to be assigned under subdivision (a), the provision is against the public policy of this state and is unenforceable .

Other states (e.g., Texas) have different laws that favor the employer. This is likely one of the many reasons a large amount of entrepreneurial economic activity has continued to exist around Silicon valley and not elsewhere in the USA despite the high cost of doing business in the state. Another provision that helps Californai is the prohibition of generic non-compete clauses (which sadly is a real problem in other potential hi-tech areas such as Canada).

Comment Re:PayPal Fees (Score 1) 105

$1 Billion usually can move with the help of the US Treasury Bank... every real bank has a large supply of money there, destroyed and waiting to be reprinted.

Okaaaay... Now, what planet did you say you were from again? ;^)

On the odd chance you were attempting to be serious, you probably are thinking about electronic transactions through FedWire or CHIPS (the industrial strength versions of ACH and EFT). The US Treasury doesn't move any money around for anyone but itself, nor does any bank actually reprint money that is transferred...

However, it is unlikely that these would be used for a simple equity transaction like this. More likely you would see such a transaction clear through DTCC, although with a private company like SpaceX, there may be other simpler arrangements...

Comment Re:Galactic Fracking (Score 1) 121

Or maybe say this radio signal was bait/chum and we (or perhaps our planet) are the game in someone else's sport.

Apparently nobody has a clue about these so called FRBs, so nobody can prove us wrong ;^)

On the other hand it appears that these signals are pulse compressed a bit by some kind of intergalactic dispersive media (electron gas?) so if someone was actually looking for some thing in the intergalactic void, this is a pretty plausible analogy to deep seismic sounding the cosmos...

Comment Re:More people should be serious about this (Score 5, Insightful) 136

It's not like drug-resistant bacteria are going to rise up and kill us all at once some day in a weird, snotty epidemic...

Actually, it may be like that... tuberculosis and pneumonia are quite capable in ravaging through our population if unchecked.

In the years right before the wide availability of antibiotics in the US (1930's), just these two bacterial infections were responsible about 20% of all deaths in the US (not including other bacterial infections). If you've seen someone suffering TB, perhaps it might be considered your weird snotty epidemic...

Also, those mushroom-based antibiotics aren't the ones of last resort. The nasty antibiotics with all the nasty side-effects are the modern ones (that are basically injectable pesticides that doctors often hold back as last resort). If we don't clean up our act we might be going back to something more akin to a pre-anti-biotic Victorian era with people dying of consumption (not some quaint 60's ampicillin pill-poping rehash).

Slashdot Top Deals

In every non-trivial program there is at least one bug.

Working...