Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Long Term Waste EASY.. (Score 1) 599

WRONG AGAIN---WOULD YOU LIKE TO TRY TO TRY FOR DOUBLE JEOPARDY?

Secondly, this reactor does NOT use a thorium fuel cycle. "It will make use of MOX fuel, a mixture of PuO2 and UO2." (same link above). Rather, what it does is OUTPUT processed thorium that can be used to jump-start a later, hypothetical, thorium-based reactor. In other words: The current project is just "Stage II" in India's 3-stage nuclear program, which has taken since the 1950's to even get to this point. Stage III is now hoped to be a reality maybe around 2050:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India%27s_three_stage_nuclear_power_programme#Stage_III_.E2.80.93_thorium_based_reactors

HERE IS THE REAL ANSWER---TIME TO UPDATE WikiPedia Started construction of a 500 MW prototype fast breeder reactor at Kalpakkam and this is now under construction by BHAVINI. The unit is expected to be operating in 2010, fuelled with uranium-plutonium oxide (the reactor-grade Pu being from its existing PHWRs). It will have a blanket with thorium and uranium to breed fissile U-233 and plutonium respectively. This will take India's ambitious thorium program to stage 2, and set the scene for eventual full utilization of the country's abundant thorium to fuel reactors. Four more such fast reactors have been announced for construction by 2020. Initial FBRs will be have mixed oxide fuel but these will be followed by metallic-fuelled ones to enable shorter doubling time. http://rawcell.com The 500 MWe FBR being built at Kalpakkam requires two tons of plutonium and seven-eight tons of natural uranium oxide at each fuelling. Thorium Oxide is fed in the periphery of the reactor. rawcell.com

Comment Re:Long Term Waste EASY.. (Score 1) 599

It Burns the THORIUM with LESS THAN .1 % WASTE BYPRODUCTS! It is therefor 99.9 % efficient about fuel use. Sorry to not be specific enough. Conversion of the Power to useful work is what isn't efficient and this has to do with the steam engines not with the THORIUM being burned. Efficiency of the best steam engines which work at a high temperature is somewhere around 55 -60 %. http://rawcell.com

Comment Re:Long Term Waste EASY.. (Score 1) 599

"Started construction of a 500 MW prototype fast breeder reactor at Kalpakkam and this is now under construction by BHAVINI. The unit is expected to be operating in 2010, fuelled with uranium-plutonium oxide (the reactor-grade Pu being from its existing PHWRs). It will have a blanket with thorium and uranium to breed fissile U-233 and plutonium respectively. This will take India's ambitious thorium program to stage 2, and set the scene for eventual full utilization of the country's abundant thorium to fuel reactors. Four more such fast reactors have been announced for construction by 2020. Initial FBRs will be have mixed oxide fuel but these will be followed by metallic-fuelled ones to enable shorter doubling time." link http://rawcell.com

Comment Re:Long Term Waste EASY.. (Score 1) 599

At the moment I can not prove that you are wrong on your second statement. Yes it appears the date has slipped, however on your second statement about it not being able to burn thorium, a technical release from the IGCAR center indicates that it is capable of burning a Thorium Uranium Mix. Unfortunately I can not locate this pdf at this time. I will post the link when I find it.http://rawcell.com

Comment Long Term Waste EASY.. (Score 3, Interesting) 599

Simple as changing from Uranium to Thorium as a fuel supply. It consumes a small amount of Uranium to keep it's reaction going (which is why it can't go boom ) and burns with 99.9 % efficiency. Most of the remaining waste only remains radioactive for 10 years while a small amount the size of a coke can per MW remains radioactive for 300 years instead of Uranium's 10,000 years. It also is hugely less possible to proliferate than Uranium at the same time. In addition Thorium is so abundant and easy to refine that it appears easy compared to mining coal. It would cost us 1.6 Trillion in capital cost to convert all coal plants to LFTR Reactors (starting in about a 5 year time frame, once we have made the investment (23 Billion ) to overcome the inner containers materials problem. All other problems have been solved. In fact India will have their first full scale Thorium test reactor online THIS YEAR. A 500MW boohemoth! Within 3 years they will have 6 more that will follow for COMMERCIAL USE. So why not the US? I will leave it with this note there is other types of reactors that burn spent Uranium in larger quantities so consideration of them is also is an important feature to getting rid of long term waste.

Comment Personal Recording Is A Good Thing! (Score 1) 318

I for one welcome the ability for individuals to record their lives, so long as they don't reveal that data without a court case(and the penalties for doing so should be high). Having it for ones personal use I don't see a problem with. Tends to hold everyone accountable for their actions. I am sure this statement will create a flood of controversy! http://rawcell.com

Submission + - Fill me up with, em, "Water Please", and "Change My Battery!" (phinergy.com)

wanfuse123 writes: "A rawcell.com admin came across an interesting website, Phinergy.com demonstrates aluminum-air battery able to power car for 1000 miles The gist of it is that metal-air batteries generate electricity through the oxidation of aluminum. Turning it to Aluminum Oxide with the assistance of water. Fifty-five pounds of plates can power the car for 1000 miles, needing a water refill every 200 miles. I had suggested using a system for capturing the water from the air that way stops wouldn't be necessary. Others have suggested that the plates would weigh 82 pounds when they needed replacement. A network of recovery sites would need to be setup. The company believes cars with the device could go on sale as early as 2017. I am curious about the Slashdot crowds opinions on this game changing technology!"

Comment We need to Capture a LARGE Asteroid with Value (Score 1) 106

We should be looking at getting the technology to capture LARGE asteroids instead of planning a mission to mars. If we use government funds to push private industries into getting a large rock with value into moons orbit it can provide us with a source of material to help us colonies space which is a much better goal than trying to visit mars with humans. We can continue use robots to explore mars while we work on mining space rocks for rare earths for earth and also for space and for a moon base. Perhaps it would be even better to capture a comet since the most valuable space element is water. http://rawcell.com/

Comment 16 Ways to Save the Planet #8 (Score 2) 158

I just finished writing an article on 16 ways to save the planet. Number 8 was to institute a efficiency standards. Design a moving goal post to keep pressing the issue in a sort of energy efficiency Mores Law. Currently our brains are a million times more efficient than the computers we run and at the same time are a million times more powerful! If we press the issue and put money into it we can build the technology to get our computers to match the efficiency of the human brain. There already has been several designs proposed to make this happen including using old analog types of computer designs instead of digital ones which are far more efficient for some things. Also designing chips to come up with correct answers using the chaos and noise rather than by overriding the noise by pushing high voltage differences between 1's and 0's.

Slashdot Top Deals

Force needed to accelerate 2.2lbs of cookies = 1 Fig-newton to 1 meter per second

Working...