Comment Re:RPN calcs- esp 35s (Score 1) 328
It's the successor to the 33s, which had an odd keyboard but was otherwise ok, which in turn was the successor to the 32S/32SII. Those are still quite capable calculators if you find one around.
Here's that odd keyboard. Geez, form over function is bad enough; it's not supposed to actually hurt your eyes...
The 35s is allowed on a number of tests where fancier calculators aren't, including the NCEES. Not the cheapest, but capable. Its support for polar complex numbers covers what you seem to be asking for.
The wiki-p page for the 35s. Wow! - the first time I've seen this; looks like their classic design. Is HP back when it comes to calculators? In the Reception section of this page, among other things, we have: "While welcoming the improved handling of complex numbers compared to the 33s, the incomplete support for them has been criticised."
Notice that on the above wiki-p pages for the 33s and 35s, although in the right-hand sidebars it says "Manufacturer: HP", it also says "Design firm: (company name)". It does not say that for the 32s or the 42s. Can the sort of dedication to a product line that we miss be contracted out?
Enough people considered the 42S to be the best calculator ever made that it goes for absurd prices on ebay.
FWIW, back in the day I had a 48s - but sold it and bought a 42s because I wanted something I could more easily nudge around a desk and use 1-handed (and for nontrivial stuff I would use desktop apps). It's still within reach right now. From my cold dead hands!