Comment Re:Validity? (Score 1) 370
The windows 7 start menu is much more sensible: and alphabetical list with clickable folders. It scales well, it doesn't require any dexterity to manipulate it. Just pin your most used applications and you're set. What is so difficult about that?
No it does not scale well. You know why? One simple reason: It has a fixed size. The Windows XP application list certainly had its issues, but at least it had one big advantage: It was able to use all your screen space. I have a 24" monitor and on Windows 7, this means the Start menu fill about 1/8th part of the screen. Which means that as soon as you want to find something, you end up needing to do unnecessary clicking and scrolling just to get to your application. ( Assuming you don't know the name of the application of course. ) If it could be resized, I could simply scale it to a size that I am comfortable with ( three quarters of the screen or so ) and avoid all the unnecessary scrolling. The addition of searching was pretty useful, I just don't know why they had to break the "classic" use case of the Start Menu for that. For the rest there really is little difference between the two versions of the Start menu.