Comment Re:Who is the new dictator? (Score 1) 271
You are quite evil to insist that would have been a good thing for the Libyan people.
Reading comprehension: Epic fail.
Here's what I wrote (emphasis added): "Yes, it would not have been good for the people"
What do you think the word I've now emphasized means?
Nice try, but your not back pedaling fast enough. Here is the context you responded to, and I called you out on:
The problem with Libya was that it had a stable, successful socialist economy
Doesn't look stable to me. Recall that the rebellion predated the foreign powers.
MaxWell Demon:Well, it was stable in the sense that without the help of NATO, Gaddafi would probably have been able to stop the rebellion. Yes, it would not have been good for the people, but since when do any governments care about the people
You down play genocide by colloquially referring to it as "it would not have been good for the people, but since when do any governments care about the people". What's more, you do it in the context of a discussion were stability is advocated as the one benefit for Libyan people of remaining under Gaddafi versus an unknown future with the NATO backed opposition.
That is evil, even if you are too ignorant to have intended it.