100% people should smoke weed and stfu

co-creation is a good word, it's tauted a lot in creative crowdsourcing sites that i participate on but hardly anyone wants to show their ideas to others. So most are closed private contests. In ad agencies, creatives sit together and bounce off ideas which lead to new ideas, the same can be done in crowdsourcing and every other place. Let all the ideas get complied in one place, ranked and upvoted, then ideas from ideas will be born. Everything should be done using crowdsourcing democratic idea selection. If there is a giant mega corporation that is diversified in everything and gets all its ideas and work done through crowdsourcing, NO ONE would be able to compete against it.

u wanna get electro shocked? screw that man, smoke some weed while on a trip to a beach or the mountains whatever you prefer, then you will not want to electro shock yourself. :)

sounds like my current dilemma with creative crowdsourcing :/

they want more people to buy bitcoins over christmas, 'their bitcoins', so they will rake in the $s from the sales of 50% of their BTC holdings, then the other 50% they will absolutely dump into the market at throwaway prices, making BTC value plummet, then they will buy back. It is obvious isn't it, that the people who should be most threatened by bitcoin, like BoA, would never say a good thing about it unless they had some selfish motive in doing so.

This...was beautiful.

Google "topcoder" go compete with ur best, if ur the best u get paid

Cguck the cv, compete on topcoder.com topcoder.net

sounds so cool!

i echo your sentiment, it's funny at first, but later it becomes funny for a different reason - that it's taken from granted and no one raises their hand, fist or finger

u mean lead leads to crime? wow, really? wow!

also also, dafuqqqq, noone, NOT ONE, person in all of the above comments has remarked about the similarities between the ships in the movie and the ones in Eve Online game!!!?

dafuq, does /. prevent us from quoting lines from the main article above?????? excerpt from soulskill's /. review - "The point. of the scene was to show ..Ender's deliberate use of brutality ..and intimidation to secure safety from t.he large. group of en.emies.".....hmmmmm so is THIS what THEY are doing out there in the middle east?. another excerpt - "Ender's interface i..n command school is far. more graphical and pretty than is sensib.le. It's c.ool to see, an.d I suspect viewers. who are unfam.iliar with the .book won't think twice ab.out it". Exactly!!! I haven't read the book and after being wowed by the movie when i heard that the book was written in 1985 i wondered jsut how the author in 1985 would have imagined such hi-tech computers. and another "They gave. up the biggest plot .twist ahead of tim.e; there w.re at least two obvious r.ferences to what was going t.o happen. Ender i.s kept in the dark, but. the audience. is not, which is too bad for ne.w viewers." Not sure what Soulskill means by this, i did not get any plot twist, nor way any given before time, and im a new viewer who hasnt read the book, the twist in the end, that the game was not a game but a representation of reality hit me like WHOAAA