To whoever posted this note, thanks. That moderation reflects the fact that moderators are just people that have been given the privilege of moderating based on their status. Their status is based on the opinions of other moderators, which in turn had their moderator privilege granted based on the same status. The privilege of moderation is therefore just a vicious circle where majority rules, wether majority could be either right or wrong, but more often than not, due to lack of actual knowledge wrong. If this were an academic organization, moderation would actually be based in knowledge and an analytical point of view rather than just emotions. I can just assume that this moderator thinks highly of an organization that is nothing more than a high tech gossip enabler. Also, I bet I’ll be moderated -10 for this.