Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Typical product placement (Score 1) 166

Product placement in TV and movies has always gone to the highest bidder, when they can get a bidder. In a capitalist marketplace, image is everything and valuable. When no one pays, the brands on-screen are usually anonymized somehow. Who can afford to pay more than Apple for product placement in their own content? If Elon Musk was making a movie you can bet that the bad guys getting caught in the chase scenes wouldn't be driving Tesla's.

Comment The examples are in-app (Score 3, Informative) 87

Sheesh, mindless click-bait articles hits a new high (or is it low). What is described are reminders that certain services are subscription based. Imagine that! What isn't described are ads for pills to make body parts larger/smaller/perkier, scam ads about debt reduction, sponsored content (love that play on words) and pop-up/pop-over/pop-under ads with screaming audio.

Comment Re:Sounds good to me (Score 1) 173

You're not a weirdo, you're just outside the norm like me; I'm exactly the opposite. I don't like ANY ads. I find ads intrusive and annoying. Targeted ads are just ads focused enough to increase the frequency of people buying things they didn't intend to buy in the first place. That's not a benefit, it's a more efficient parasite. I'm the same way about entertainment bundles ... don't like them and won't pay for one. They sell bundles of dozens of channels of crap with maybe 3 or 4 channels I'll ever watch; no thanks. I don't mind paying for the content I want and need (I have several subscriptions) and I don't use free (ad supported) content if I can avoid it.

Slashdot Top Deals

It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.

Working...