Comment Re:Cherry Picking is Much of the Issue (Score 1) 335
One of my pet peeves is the increase in named storms being used to "prove" AGW, when the reality is many storms are achieving named storm status that would never have been given that status 30, 40,or 50 years ago. These storms technically meet the requirements, reaching it momentarily while still far off shore then die back down below this magic level, yet retaining this magic "named storm" status, only through modern 24/7 sensors and tracking. In years past these same storms would have been unlikely to reach the magic "named storm" status unless a hurricane hunter air craft were to make a measurement at just the right moment, these hurricane hunter planes might only visit a storm that was a distant threat to land for an hour or two every couple of days if at all, with growing coverage as the storms approached land, but even at the best of times this coverage would be measured in a few hours per day.