Comment Re:Some quasi-scientific experiments (Score 5, Informative) 214
IThe footer of google.cn reads "According to local laws, regulations and policies, some search results are not shown." (google translation)
IThe footer of google.cn reads "According to local laws, regulations and policies, some search results are not shown." (google translation)
Those fingetprints are physical charactistics due to manufacturing process. You can't duplicate them in software.
These are passive tags, i.e. ultra-low power consumption. You can't put any decent crypto on it.
just make the fine print a jpeg file with low quality or embed in flash
Yes, it can be done server-side, using IP tracking, login and so on.
One word: NAT.
My issues with USB 2.0 are not so much about speed:
1- there's that ridiculous fudging about hi-speed, full-speed... is USB 3.0 **ALWAYS** USB 3.0, at last ?
USB 3.0 is USB 3.0 SuperSpeed.
... "right" version of the CYP2D6 gene
They should have used git for version control.
... a director at IBM's Almaden Research Center
He is just trying to sell some mainframe computer.
This paper looks suspiciously like data-mining to find an hypothesis. It's based on a cohort study that was not specifically designed for finding a correlation of this type.....
Read the NHS article:
"....As it is designed prospectively, it also avoids the chance of reverse causation, i.e. the possibility that in some way violent offending might determine dietary habit.
If it's digital, exact copies are possible.
[...]
If it's digital, the process is fast and can be automated, and the threat is increased a million-fold (out of arse, of course) by sheer statistics. We need slow electronics
[...]
If it's digital, tampering is undetectable.
hmm.. in fact, there are smart card with microprocessor empowered with strong public key encryption that would make cloning very difficult and always detectable.
But the government just don't care (or can't tell the different)
Make headway at work. Continue to let things deteriorate at home.
