"Most secure ever", even if a relative term, still implies that MS believed that security was a priority for this product, and also a selling point. If they didn't believe it was secure in any way, then they would never have used the term "most secure ever", or even have referred to security at all.

The fact that they try to use some fine print buried in the EULA to give themselves an out doesn't resolve them from responsibility. If they tout security in any way, then they're claiming their OS is secure. This makes them responsible if there are blatant security flaws which they neglect to fix in a timely fashion.

Well, I'm in Rome right now and 90% of the city is 300+ years old, with some buildings in continuous use well over 1000. In the States, Hoover dam is getting close. So yeah, 80 seems manageable if you are actually building things to last and not just random crap that gets people on a payroll.

Yeah, the old process involved using a cutter to separate the front from the funnel while under a constant spray of water to keep lead dust from killing people, though I believe I misspoke and they actually leave the leaded section leaded until it's reprocesses. The front section is typically vacuumed or washed out to remove the phosphorus powder (which is a bastard to clean up when you break one sometimes) and then different glasses are separated and graded before being sent to smelters or glass to glass recyclers.

Most newer methods of seen involve updraft systems that basically keep the air moving away from any personnel while the cutting and breaking is done, although in my experience many places using this method don't appropriately maintain their ventilation systems which are prone to clogging (and then becoming completely useless, even though if you try to check it by hand you can still feel the air current)