Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:12TB+ is massive (Score 1) 609

After reading up, I think unRAID is great for this particular type of use - where the data isn't critical - I mean you can live without some of your consumable media - and your data loss potential is partitioned off nicely on a drive by drive basis.

Traditional raid, while simple to understand and set up is often not managed correctly - you have to have the right hot spares, you have to know what your rebuild times are, size the arrays right (right amount of parity -vs- data with relation to rebuild time) and you need to have it monitored correctly so you can act quickly when you have a mistake.

I'm seriously thinking of going out to hunt for some gear today and build a giant unRAID setup to replace my ZFS box...... I like it.

Comment Re:Look at the DroboPro (Score 1) 609

My point was more around the setup of the RAID, and the migration to larger volumes - that's much simpler on a DROBO than with other systems like ZFS.

Also - their BeyondRaid is quite innovative - unlike the traditional RAID setups we all know, they've done it on a block by block (or at least by some allocation unit...) level - so when you pop a drive out and put in a larger one, it can restore redundancy and decide where to put things on a per-block basis. (That's probably where the apparent slowness comes from)

On a normal raid system, you can't take a 1TB drive and two 500GB drives and have it automatically set up a 1TB mirror. You would first have to create a raid-0 or JBOD of the two 500GB drives, then layer a mirror on top of that of 1TB. You also can't just decide you want to double the size of it and swap all the drives out and have it magically grow (except ZFS....).

SO yeah -drobo is good for those home users who don't want to mess around too much with raid innards and study how raid works.

Comment Re:Something like this (Score 2, Informative) 609

Unless they changed something since they published their howto - your BZZT has it's facts wrong....

Backblaze pods use 45 drives in each pod.

Each pod is made up of 3 Raid-6 volumes.

Each Raid-6 volume is made up of 15 drives (13 drives + 2 parity)

There are two parity disks for every 13 data disks. That's higher than you might want to go in a normal enterprise setting, but as they also handle redundancy between pods, it's an acceptable tradeoff in their case that I'm sure they've calcluated out quite well given drive sizes and rebuild times and all that......

Comment Re:Even if you don't get a drobo ... (Score 1) 609

Watch the video - it's not.

Without reformatting - you can pull out the smallest drive (well really, any drive in most cases, but replacing the smallest makes the most sense) and drop in a bigger one. Then you wait for it to automatically rebuild /migrate data to obtain redundancy again - and then you can swap out the next drive to grow your system. The only catch is the initial format - the drobo fakes out the block device size to the maximum size you ever expect to use, at the expense of boot time (for the drobo).

The drobo seems to do block-level raid - each allocation block (or whatever they happen to call it) can have it's own raid level and mirrored to a block on another block on another drive - independely, so you can migrate and raid between different sized drives with a minimum of wasted space. (It will only waste what it can't mirror somehow)

If you drop in a 1TB drive and a 500GB drive, it will give you 500GB of space. If you swap the 500GB drive with a 2TB drive, it will show you 1TB of space. If you then drop in a second 3TB in a spare slot, it will show you 3TB of space after it finishes shuffling things around - watch the demo video - it's actually quite clever and different.

Regaular old raid arrays just don't resize like that.
ZFS can with some manipulations.......

Comment Re:Software RAID (Score 1) 609

That's why you have a hotspare & an external spare to pop in when you get a drive failure - and the monitoring to back it up and fire off alarms when a drive fails - because in Raid5, as soon as one drive fails, you are exposed (and with TB SATA drives, rebuild times are long.). Raid6 is a better option - same footprint as Raid5 with a hotspare and you have some elbow room for rebuild times because you have double redundancy.

Also remember that drives bought at the same time tend to fail at the same time.

The bottom line though is - make sure you have backups of your important data - raid is not backup no matter how you slice it.

Comment Re:SATA port multipliers (Score 1) 609

Coraid has sata over ethernet gizmos..... that's not really new. I think they are relatively cheap as well - that's their market niche.

As to having it available to all your computers - while technically true - this is potentially dangerous - your common filesystems (ntfs, ext3, fat,e tc, HFS+, ZFS, etc) are not cluster filesystems - they are designed for a single machine to mount at a time. What's worse is some won't recognize if you DO manage to mount the same filesystem to two machines, and you'll end up corrupting data before you realize what's happened.

If you want access to the same data from multiple computers - you want something that exports a network filesystem - NFS, CIFS, AFS, or whatever (or all of the above I guess....).

Comment Re:Look at the DroboPro (Score 1) 609

I'll second that - while I don't use a drobo - it's on the purchase list.

I'm highly technically competent - I use an opensolaris fileserver with ZFS and some terabyte drives - and sure, I can expand it and do all kinds of cool things - but in the end, I could get the same features I get there (the ones I actually use) out of a drobo, with less hassle.

With my fileserver I have to know a bunch of stuff about how to manipulate it to expand it... with a Drobo, you have to watch some blinkenlights and just pop in bigger drives when you need to grow. It locks dives when you shouldn't remove them, and is dead simple to use. From all my research, it's unparalleled in the ease of use department for joe average.

Comment Re:Yay! finally some accountability for all those (Score 1) 205

Yes - exactly. The "Return unopened goods at any time" is a marketing tool (and a good one for the consumer) - but not something they are required to do by law. That policy has aboslutely nothing to do with the "fit for purposes sold" legal end of things - and the two are often mixed up at big box stores when people return broken things.

The store would be free to say "all sales are final" and not accept returns (other than broken items) - they do that in many stores here where I live - but they also unpack and test most electronic stuff before you leave the store to avoid dealing with broken returns, which could be fraudulent (and really saves everyone time and money in the long run)

Comment Re:Yay! finally some accountability for all those (Score 1) 205

Indeed complicated... but if I buy a box with software in it in the store, and you, the sales guy, tell me it will do X, and it really WONT do X, no EULA should protect you - the software vendor is probably fine - but if the store selling the box of software LIED about it's capabilities to make the sale - that's fraudulent, and illegal in most places. In Canada, for instance, you'd have to accept a return and give a FULL refund if the product was not fit for the purposes sold.

Slashdot Top Deals

Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence. -- Dijkstra

Working...