Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Just the next step in the social network lifecy (Score 2) 274

Except I don't see Google pawning off their service. They ARE the conglomo-corp. And historically their ads are not terribly invasive in their services, because the ads are so much better targeted at the users that they don't have to pepper the page with a dozen ads.

Google can really stick it (gymnastics term, weird of me) if they don't force the UI changes on the user. Develop new stuff, absolutely, don't force it.

Comment Re:To answer your questions ... (Score 1) 515

He did say they were tasked with setting up a room full of computers, so I would imagine that these gentlemen are not constrained to any of the roles you mentioned. They are probably considered by their employer as "general IT specialists", which is often the case in smaller companies. Whether they agree with their assigned task or not is irrelevant - they were told to do it and failed where the newbie figured it out, regardless of time frame. Furthermore someone was tasked with purchasing the equipment and failed to determine if their antiquated OS choice would even operate to their requirements before spending "thousands of dollars" (which could be a mere handful of PCs, ha ha!).

"I believe most IT people are interested in fancy new technology,"
My experience is that in the broadest definition, that's not true at all.

So these people you know in the "information technology" category who are not interested in new technology, what are they interested in? Old information technology? Those people are called archaeologists.

Comment To answer your questions ... (Score 1) 515

Because you asked direct questions I will answer them, rather than providing a list of snarky remarks.

What is the average age of your workplace?

I work for what I believe is actually a fairly young company. The average age is probably 30, possibly slightly higher but I wouldn't expect it to be over 35.

How easily do your coworkers accept and absorb new technology?

We're a bunch of geeks - we LIVE for new technology. That's not to say we accept everything with open arms, there's plenty of bitching when something bucks the norm, but for the most part we like new stuff and we like integrating it into our clients' environments.

Are most IT environments like this, where people refuse to learn anything about new technology they don't like, or did I just get stuck with a batch of stubborn case-screws?"

I believe most IT people are interested in fancy new technology, making it work, and integrating it with things they are already familiar with. However, there are people who are just in it for the money and probably don't have the interest in geeky exploration. They took required courses and fulfill a specific role. If you ask them to do something outside of that role they will become agitated quickly.

Databases

Submission + - Documenting Network Devices 1

LoudMusic writes: One of the many tasks of a network administrator is documenting the network so that other members of the administration and support teams can find devices on the network. Currently my organization uses Excel spreadsheets to handle this, and it's invariably error ridden. We also save a new file with the date in the name each time an update is made.

I'd like to move this to a more intelligent database system, but the driving force for keeping it in spreadsheets is the ability to take the document offline, edit it, then upload this new revision to the file server when we have a connection again. Our clients often don't have reliable internet connections, especially when we're tearing their network apart and rebuilding it.

The information we're currently documenting about an individual device are; device name, device model, description, IP address, MAC address, physical location, uplink switch & port, and VLAN.

What tools exist that would allow us to have multiple users make updates both online and offline simultaneously, and synchronize changes into both the online and offline copies?

Comment Caching (Score 3, Interesting) 179

I only wish my phone would hold by default the X-million data points that my outmoded (but cheap and functional) dedicated GPS device does, without quite so much cloud-centric bottlenecking, and leave all expensive data use for optional overlays and current conditions.

No shit dude. I have a fucking 32GB phone of which I'm using about 3GB. The thing I use more than anything is Google Maps. If it's downloaded something, why does it ever delete it? I can cache apparently unlimited 10 mile squares (100 square miles?), but I can't say "Just fucking download the entire state of Iowa" (because, really, who would want to?).

But I suppose they're getting there. Slowly.

Comment Re:Depends on the era of "you" (Score 1) 309

I'm curious what these old peripherals are that you need old PCs to support.

A friend of mine claims his PC based firewall does something superior to my Linksys router with alternative firmware. Sure it's more powerful but it also uses more power, generates more heat, and takes up more space and time managing it. My router is small, silent, and I never have to touch it. It routes my packets and protects my network. And I don't see the point of having and old PC for web browsing if you have a better computer at your disposal. It's either the primary computer for some user in the house, provides a specific purpose that can not be provided by the primary computer of some user in the house, or it's trash.

Using a PC as a NAS is definitely preferable, in my opinion, to a consumer NAS. Those things are invariably featureless and fail if you look at them funny. But if there's less than a handful of PCs on the network you might as well just throw a huge f'ing hard drive in one of the workstations and share it to the network. That's all your "PC NAS" is anyway.

In my house:

Primary workstation shared by my wife and I, and an occasional overnight guest
Also serves as file server, print server, and gaming PC
Printer/Scanner attached by USB
Roughly 2TB of storage

TV PC for video playback and rare gaming sessions, attached to TV
Loads files from workstation

Old laptop on a custom shelf in front of the treadmill for video playback
Loads files from workstation

Router/Access point with DDWRT (need to look into other options, but it works so why bother)

We each have a smart phone that talks on our wireless network.

I have a work laptop that I bring home for gaming and general surfing (and occasional work, hate to admit).

What do you do on your home network that I can't do? Honestly - I want to know. I have three computers and a router for two people.

Slashdot Top Deals

Reality must take precedence over public relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled. -- R.P. Feynman

Working...