Comment Re:Encryption? (Score 1) 197
Right. Assange wrote a piece about Google
Right. Assange wrote a piece about Google
I said such a thing in a recent post (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=6696045&cid=48782413), but much less eloquently .
Ow, good quote.
It's a public secret that the reason NSA 's billion dollar program doesn't intercept any terrorist communication is their spam filters
that many more came after you.
My wife: Her pussy was always wet until we got married; then it dried up.
Maybe you just haven't noticed the followup part of the metaphor...
Could be, I don't know. Dissolve and spray? But you really need very little to close the place because the actual extent of the danger doesn't matter much. Perception runs its own course.
Alpha emissions are easily shielded too. On the other hand, if the sample is broken and dispersed they can't avoid closing the whole place down. Small amounts of plutonium function great in dirty bombs.
To be honest I don't really think there are any black flag operations involved in whatever you think..
But I do think it's about the money.
The real problem is
No.
no matter what the situation, no matter the result, there will always be a segment of the population that is unhappy with how a cop handled the situation
Yes.
for those involved 10 billion per year that is redirected to the right pockets just means a huge success. To maintain a budget like that you'll hire terrorists if necessary.
Then maybe I should rephrase it. I'm talking about militarization in the sense that you treat the other party as an enemy who is trying to kill you and whose life has very little value in comparison to yours. Not in terms of structure and discipline.
I suppose you'll have kneejerk reactions in both directions. The thing that's popping up now and then is militarization. That they're moving towards warlike thinking and warlike methods.
Recall that for a recent shooting of a 12 year old kid in the park the police released video footage. The footage was used in defense of the police actions. They showed a police car driving right up to the kid, getting out and shooting the kid. The cops thought that was perfectly alright because the kid had a gun and they couldn't know the gun wasn't real. But ask any cop in a european country how they would have handled it. First, it's suicidal because if the kid had really been dangerous the cop would have been dead with that maneuver. Second, they should have stayed at a distance and ordered the kid to put the gun down.
Now those cops and taser footage? Any action that the cops don't approve of would be seen (with sincere conviction) as a reason for tasering.
You'll need a solution for all that footage of shoes
Are you having fun yet?
