Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:It's not privacy, it's obscurity (Score 1) 142

someone would have to actually be part of your social circle to learn about you. That is no longer true, but we still have not quite caught up with that new reality.

It's not new. Here in Oregon (and in most states) voter registration is public record. Got a name? They'll look it up for you on the phone for free. DMV records are public, too: it's a bit spendy to buy them one at a time but surprisingly cheap to buy them all in machine readable formats. (Wonder how that mechanic knows you have a Honda to send you the "We specialize in Honda repairs!" flier? They bought a list from the DMV of all registered Honda owners...)

The local county will gladly sell a list of all properties, their assessed and real values, owners, square footage, number of bedrooms/baths, year built, etc.

None of this is new: it goes back for decades -- it's just easier to sort through now.

Yes, it seems problematic for privacy: on the flip side, when CA changed it's laws after Rebecca Schaeffer was killed (a stalker found her home address through DMV records), a lawyer friend of mine complained about how hard it was to find people in CA to send notifications of recovered property. The DMV would no longer give out addresses, so they had to jump through hoops to demonstrate a compelling legal need for that information.

Voter registration is public because of a need to verify the validity of the election rolls: think you have fraudulent voters in your district, you're empowered to wade through the data and look. (And not to mention every party wants to be able to get the a list of the self-selected members... if you claim to be a Democrat, the Democrats want to add you to their literature and 'get out the vote' drives...)

Nothing new at all... only the correlation of data is new, and that's not all that new: there was a guy busted here 20 years ago because he combined the list of "cars owned by women" with voter registrations looking for single women to send mail to. He was only busted because he happened to also work for a politician and didn't pay for the lists.

Comment Re:BS (Score 4, Informative) 314

Your link says that D&H, not Newegg threatened legal action.

Considering that D&H did not sell the fakes to Newegg, well, they are justifiably upset that people are wrongfully blaming them.

IANAL, so I don't know if they have an actionable complaint, but your link doesn't show a Newegg legal threat, and, again, D&H is understandably pissed off that they were blamed when they had nothing to do with it.

Comment Re:squeezebox family (Score 1) 438

I'll third this.

I have SB2's in the living room and bedroom, a Boom that gets moved around, a Duet in the Office and Radio at work.

All sharing from the same library. Great WAF.

One of the best purchases in my life was my initial SB2, which is why I keep expanding the player count.

And, yes, they can sync.. or not: each player is capable of playing its own stream so if you want one thing in the living room and another in the bedroom that's fine.

Security

Submission + - ImageShack Hacked! (mashable.com) 5

revjtanton writes: "Tonight a group calling themselves "Anti-Sec" hacked ImageShack and replaced many of the site's hosted images with one of their own detailing their manifesto. The group's grievance is against full-disclosure. They simply want the practice in security cirlces to end, and they've promised to cause mayhem and destruction if it doesn't.

These guys/gals are taking direct aim against a sect of the IT industry who is already armed to fight them...but they also already know that. It should be interesting to see how this plays out, whether you agree with them or not."

Music

Submission + - Pandora no longer completely free

AbyssWyrm writes: Today, I received an email (alternatively, see the blog) from Tim Westergren, the founder of Pandora, informing me that Pandora will no longer free for all users. Instead, it will be really cheap — for those with a free account, there will be a cap of 40 hours per month, and a user may pay a one-time fee of $0.99 to resume listening to music unlimited for a month. According to the blog entry, this will affect the top 10% of listeners.

Certainly not a bad deal considering the price, and I suspect that Pandora is one of few free internet resources whose users are loyal enough to pay a small fee to keep it afloat. Hopefully this does not become a slippery slope.
Security

Submission + - Is there a zero-day OpenSSH exploit in the wild? (dshield.org)

eefsee writes: sans.org reports 'Over the past 24 hours we've had a number of readers tell us that there is an OpenSSH exploit in active use.' It is not clear if this is a real exploit or sysadmin CYA masquerading as exploit, but some web hosts have already turned of SSH in response. On 7/5 HostGator shut down SSH on all its shared servers. Site5 did the same thing the next day. The loss of SSH, of course, kills SFTP on these hosts as well, forcing customers to fall back on FTP. Now that is security!

Comment Re:Why the outrage? (Score 1) 334

CBS Records that published Michael Jackson's Off the Wall is NOT the same company as CBS records that published the NCIS soundtrsck.

RIAARader's database does not know this.

CBS sold off their recording labels 20 some years ago.

CBS Records was "resurrected" to sell TV show soundtracks... specifically NCIS.

It has no relation at all to Columbia or CBS/EPIC etc etc. NONE.

So your link to RIAARadar points out mostly records owned by Sony, not CBS...

Slashdot Top Deals

Mystics always hope that science will some day overtake them. -- Booth Tarkington

Working...