I remember exporting individual frames of animated GIFs, correct/add something to, or just reverse it, put it back together and use it on another crappy Geocities website.
Oh, and the "Awards"! Apparently clicking links through images was a difficult task back then. I gotta admit, I have a little corner in my heart for the god damned MIDI files.
Probably some others.
You mean He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.
You mean Candlejack? That isn't hacker rela
What a misleading title (both here and throughout the article)
With the paranoia that abounds in this place regarding privacy, you instantly think about taking all your info off FB servers for good when you read "Reclaim your data".
This is mostly about privacy options and reporting duplicate photos.
This is about as relevant to my driving skills as it is to my jumping-on-turtles skills in real life.
Even if you are unjustly banned from Facebook, you can come back and re-add all those people, at least the "main" ones, and work your way again to having 350 friends, I'm sure he didn't find them all in 2 days the first time around, and I genuinely doubt he kept in touch each and every single one of them. He can't learn their names and make a second account and look them up?
He wasn't smart enough to ask for phone numbers and/or e-mails after contacting far away relatives?
He can't use services like instant messengers?
How did he survive before Facebook existed, suing telecommunication providers because their service fees were too high, thus prohibiting and/or limiting his access to contact loved ones from afar?
Is all this still Facebook's fault?
Do you remember those days when Google didn't have the fancy-schmancy auto-complete or instant-search? I do, because I never used them, so this doesn't affect me in the slightest.
If you're gonna search for The Red Dragon torrent, you KNOW you're gonna have to type it out, instead of waiting for Google to finish the phrase for you. So basically you are whining that you're gonna have to type search inquiries, are we really this lazy?
This is why I don't think it'll die as fast as some of us want it to, because just as crappy video games are enhanced by good visuals, mediocre movies are likely to draw masses even after bad reviews if they look good.
To me this is not a revolutionary way of looking at movies, just another tool to enhance what's already present, just like 2-speakers turned into 5, then 8, etc. Better sound doesn't make a good movie good, it helps it, but it doesn't define it.
If it dies out, then that's that, we'll see another attempt in 20 years.
The only people that will actually wait for a religious figure to "approve" anything in order to implement it to their daily life are the people less likely to use the Internet, in this case. All the religious acquaintances I've met/kept in touch with online have used it regardless of this so-called "blessing".
It doesn't matter if you're religious or not, if you're all waiting for someone to tell you "hey, this thing ain't so bad, I used it, so you can use it too!" then you deserve to be mocked.
The suit claims that Taco Bell's meat-like offering is filled with extenders and other non-meat substances listed in the lawsuit like water, "Isolated Oat Product," wheat oats, soy lecithin, maltodrextrin, anti-dusting agent, autolyzed yeast extract, modified corn starch and sodium phosphate as well as beef and seasonings. Yum!"
I can't imagine how this awesome will be with simultaneously-connected rotating Kinects.
System going down in 5 minutes.
