Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Role Playing (Games)

ArenaNet's MMO Design Manifesto 178

An anonymous reader writes "ArenaNet studio head Mike O'Brien has posted his vision for a new type of MMORPG, which they used in developing Guild Wars 2. Quoting: 'MMOs are social games. So why do they sometimes seem to work so hard to punish you for playing with other players? If I'm out hunting and another player walks by, shouldn't I welcome his help, rather than worrying that he's going to steal my kills or consume all the mobs I wanted to kill? ... [In Guild Wars 2], when someone kills a monster, not just that player's party but everyone who was seriously involved in the fight gets 100% of the XP and loot for the kill. When an event is happening in the world – when the bandits are terrorizing a village – everyone in the area has the same motivation, and when the event ends, everyone gets rewarded.'"

Comment And the answer is.... (Score 1) 396

c) remove the Other OS, update and only use it for playing. Revenue stream continues for Sony (on new games) - but at the cost of goodwill to the company.

I don't see any decent outcome for Sony on either of the three options...

Sony is clearly aiming for this option. There is no loss of goodwill because 99.9% of customers don't care about the Other OS.

Comment Re:Oh great... (Score 1) 430

It may be a tired old line, but it also seems to be right. The problem *won't* be solved by creating new parties. The issue will continue to be raised until the political system is reformed.

Obviously, reforming the system that keeps the two parties in power while said parties are still in power is not going to be easy. But it's either attempt that or accept that the system will always be a "shithole" that does not give the people have any say on how the country is governed.

Comment Re:cd tax (Score 1) 430

Interestingly, Spain has one of the highest, if not THE highest, piracy levels in the European Union partly because of their media tax. People figure out that they're already paying for the right to pirate so they do it unabashedly. The media companies are probably banging their heads against a wall by now.

Comment Closing Sequence (Score 1) 66

The video has a post-title closing shot not unlike movie trailers from the last decade. It starts at 3:45 and it's actually funnier than what I expected (admittedly I had pretty low expectations).

The question is, when did these start showing up in officially submitted academic videos?

Comment Long Story Short... (Score 1) 80

...There are too many rumors flying around to actually know who's in the right here. It's easy to bet on the big corporation being greedy / evil / stupid. But *if* these guys did start talking to EA or other potential partners while still on Activision's payroll, they could be in breach of contract (at least if I understood industry expert Keith Boesky correctly).

Comment Re:Punish Activision (Score 1) 120

there's a good chance that indie developers can actually be very successful. See Portal and Castle Crashers, for example.

Portal is NOT an indie game. The core mechanic was originally from a student game and the dev team was mostly composed from those students, yes, but they were employed at Valve and had the support and resources of a large corporation.

Comment Re:Before the anti-ebook posts accumulate, (Score 1) 236

Also, tools exist to unDRM and convert between just about every ebook format, including Mobi, Azw, Topaz, ePub, PDF, Lit, PDB, and others, so books can in fact travel with you as you upgrade devices in the future, should you choose to go this route.

How is "you need to pirate this to get decent use out of it" an argument for actually buying something?? If I do unDRM an e-book, I'm a "criminal" in the eyes of Amazon or the copyright holder anyway. I gain nothing by paying.

Supporting non-DRM'd e-books, that's entirely another matter.

Comment No, not the shareholder profits! (Score 1) 336

Prosecutors said that excluding Pfizer would most likely lead to Pfizer's collapse, with collateral consequences: disrupting the flow of Pfizer products to Medicare and Medicaid recipients, causing the loss of jobs including those of Pfizer employees who were not involved in the fraud, and causing significant losses for Pfizer shareholders.

(Emphasis mine)

I can understand trying to shield innocent employees and patients. But is the government so deep into corporate America's pocket that they openly admit that protecting shareholder profits trumps upholding the law?

Comment Put organ donation on the public eye (Score 1) 582

This controversy is already going to have a great benefit by making everyone (in Israel at least) think about organ donation and, hopefully, make a decision on whether to become a donor or not.
As I understand, one of the major problems with organ supply is that even people who would be inclined to donate never actually register or discuss the topic with their families. By the time the question is relevant, they are no longer able to state their opinion, so the family has to agonize over the decision and tends to choose the "safe" option of not donating.

Comment Not Super Mario Bros. (Score 3, Insightful) 94

Other than the music, there's nothing on the game to make it "Super Mario Bros.". The player character runs and jumps over generic obstacles without making any use of SMB physics or any other distinctive elements. If anything it's closer to Pitfall.
Then again, "8x8 platformer created with Arduino" wouldn't attract as much publicity.

Slashdot Top Deals

The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.

Working...