c) remove the Other OS, update and only use it for playing. Revenue stream continues for Sony (on new games) - but at the cost of goodwill to the company.
I don't see any decent outcome for Sony on either of the three options...
Sony is clearly aiming for this option. There is no loss of goodwill because 99.9% of customers don't care about the Other OS.
Obviously, reforming the system that keeps the two parties in power while said parties are still in power is not going to be easy. But it's either attempt that or accept that the system will always be a "shithole" that does not give the people have any say on how the country is governed.
The question is, when did these start showing up in officially submitted academic videos?
there's a good chance that indie developers can actually be very successful. See Portal and Castle Crashers, for example.
Portal is NOT an indie game. The core mechanic was originally from a student game and the dev team was mostly composed from those students, yes, but they were employed at Valve and had the support and resources of a large corporation.
Six, if you count the DS, PSP, and PS2 (because it's still selling).
No, in 2009 the PS2 finally gave up the ghost and only sold in marginal quantities. And the PSP is only having healthy sales in Japan.
Also, tools exist to unDRM and convert between just about every ebook format, including Mobi, Azw, Topaz, ePub, PDF, Lit, PDB, and others, so books can in fact travel with you as you upgrade devices in the future, should you choose to go this route.
How is "you need to pirate this to get decent use out of it" an argument for actually buying something?? If I do unDRM an e-book, I'm a "criminal" in the eyes of Amazon or the copyright holder anyway. I gain nothing by paying.
Supporting non-DRM'd e-books, that's entirely another matter.
Prosecutors said that excluding Pfizer would most likely lead to Pfizer's collapse, with collateral consequences: disrupting the flow of Pfizer products to Medicare and Medicaid recipients, causing the loss of jobs including those of Pfizer employees who were not involved in the fraud, and causing significant losses for Pfizer shareholders.
(Emphasis mine)
I can understand trying to shield innocent employees and patients. But is the government so deep into corporate America's pocket that they openly admit that protecting shareholder profits trumps upholding the law?
The hardest part of climbing the ladder of success is getting through the crowd at the bottom.