beware of cry baby moderation by the slashdot editors below the parent of this comment... throwing a fit because someone else chose to not sell them a service they want anymore. claiming they have rights to buy the service while the very people selling it back down.

ignorant hypocrites.

does RIM pay for ads on slashdot or any other media outlet under the "geek, net." umbrella? scared to have comments painting RIM as weak on your site? slashdot.com: news for nerds, but one-sided nerds only, and only from the side that pays us. you're all pathetic.

hope that you weren't.

so i can learn how to read the words you make up and the words you misspell, and not be disappointed with you? how long does a class like that take?

you are NOTHING

so by admittedly living a lie yourself, you surmise, perhaps i might not be...

your insistence on continuing to speak doesn't make me not comfortable. is "confortable" where prisoners build makeshift dwellings?

you're an idiot.

so no matter what, "those" people will always exist. how could you be so sure unless you were one of "those" people yourself?

if you can't trust the law, and encryption can be hacked, then what point does that insurance serve?

no, they were expecting someone to try and view their data... that is why they encrypted it... and then someone did make that attempt, just like they planned for... and from the way you describe it, it sounds like your jail rotter was not successful....

it sounds more like a trap to me.

do you assume i don't expect to be paid to be off? why would i not?

you're dumber than i thought. why would you be waiting to see if i could make it worth your trouble after i already said i don't want anything that you're selling. it troubles you to provide the services you offer? because of the hypocrisy or your incompetence?

well then, if you are already expecting privacy, then why do you need to encrypt?

so either way i'm supposed to fear "savages"... and i suppose you can protect me from these "savages" for a price? no?

go sell your FUD to someone else.

it's not very practical to expect privacy while broadcasting on a public network.

unlike a world where encryption is necessary to communicate? what are you afraid of?

how are they keeping you from having it? the corporation unwilling to fight with the government is keeping you from having it. RIM offered the service. RIM is now not offering the service. the people you've entrusted (to provide you with services you are in no way guaranteed) have let you down. you have no one to blame but yourself.

trust me, i'd win regardless if the government was corrupt or not... "republocrat" or not, or even existed or not. you are a whining child. you want to provide a channel for terrorists to secretively communicate? go ahead. don't do it believing no one should care or will attempt to stop you... or do you believe people don't have the right to attempt to stop people doing things they disagree with? the whining child turns hypocritical awfully quickly.

well if you don't have the resources, or are not willing, what are you complaining about? i don't recall reading about the right to encryption in the constitution.

that story did say they were following india's example... so it's worse than a dupe... it's breaking a story that another story already referenced in the past tense.