Comment beowulf (Score 0, Redundant) 96
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.
Forget that.
Imagine a Beowulf Swarm of these.
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these.
Forget that.
Imagine a Beowulf Swarm of these.
I'm going to inter-splice book pages of the Terminator and the wizard of Oz.
A bit of tape, and I will be famous!
Would this be my creation or that of Cameron and Baum?
What if I paraphrase the sources?
What if I rewrite everything in another language?
What if I don't tell anyone what my sources are?
The limits of what we view as original work are shifting, why would that which is applicable to music or other media, not be applicable to books?
If I paint Leonardo painting the last supper and his canvas covers most of my canvas, then at what point does this cease to be my painting and become a copy of his?
What about art not in the public domain?
Would Disney be upset if I painted one of their artists creating Mickey mouse?
The girls book has won numerous awards. I don't know how much of her book really is just a "copy" of someones work, and if these are in the public domain. But her book must be interesting, otherwise this debate would not exist. To me this would qualify as 'sampling' other art to create something unique.
If I drew an illustration and someone used a part of it without my permission, at what point would I be upset? I think I would be upset if the new work decreases the value of my own work.
There are so many what if's that would be answered differently depending on culture or century, - that I find it unreasonable to think that our view should be static.
Did she copy stuff? Yes
Did she combine it into a new and unique work? Yes
Did it negatively influence any of the (non-public domain yet) copyright holders? I highly doubt it.
I disagree. Most of my friends are not hard core tinker happy nerds. And they were all underwhelmed with the iPad. In fact, I don't know a single person who was actually impressed by it.
How many of those friends have an iPhone?
If even a fraction of the people with iPhones will buy an iPad then it will be a success.
Apple is selling this as a new way to experience the internet. The hardware to accomplish this is not as impressive as the software.
Ideally - iPad software on something like the IdeaPad U1 would be great, but for now I think (for most people) a half-as-powerful Apple product has a better user-experience than a far superior (hardware-wise) product running another OS.
As for myself, if I had an iPad - then for me the priority would be to get an OS I can compile myself on it.
But I'm not most people.
The EXIF data in the moon photographs will surely prove that the moon landings were faked.
For most of my photos, this works:
cat image_name.jpg | strings | more
Aside from the recent thing in China, can you source that? I was under the impression Google followed spying and censorship laws both in the US and abroad.
I'm primarily referring to that. Are there other places where these issues were raised? Perhaps I just didn't hear about them.
Either way, Google is still nicer than the other players. But I'm still using my own mailserver.
Why Google's email and not Yahoo's, Microsoft's, or AOL's?
Because Google doesn't play nice with dictatorships and oppressive regimes.
Iran Suspends Google's Email Service
In Iran I presume
I thought that Iran was on the US trade embargo list.
My employer hasn't switched from IE6.
It's OK, your new employer might use IE8.
(my employer doesn't know I have a netbook here, I get to use Firefox
Why should Apple spend development time on something that only the vast minority of potential users, I'd estimate at >1%, will want to do?
Without that (less than) 1% who run FreeBSD where would OS X be?
I'm just hoping.
Apple excels at creating beauty, in both hardware and software (BTW, I'm using an Imac right now). This iPad is no exception.
My only question is: Will I be able to put my own Operating System on it?
The old G3,G4,G5 macs were open enough so that I could load my own OS on them (sometimes BSD, sometimes Linux).
The same goes with the current Intel macs.
While I sometimes marvel at the beauty of OS X and how Apple has created a user friendly UNIX, I want more freedom.
Unless Apple is open enough to let us (the minority) play and tinker with the internals so that we can install an OS that
might be visually inferior(to most) but is philosophically superior, unless Apple can allow us to do this - I will never buy one.
I will patiently wait until the other players create a tablet that will run x86.
All the other stuff in the article is not much use to me, all I need is make; make install.
Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.