Comment Re:NASA modernization program? (Score 1) 229
There are about seven million people making $150k or better, most of them in the top two tax brackets (and the rest in the high end of the 28% bracket). Only about 1.5 million of them are making the sort of money that would let you go without a job or retire after only a few years and still live comfortably for the rest of your life (~$400k or better). The rest of those people are well-off, certainly, but they still have to keep getting up and going to work every day to support themselves; even if you saved diligently on $150k a year, it takes a long time and wise financial decisions to reach the point where they could give up that annual income. So your ultra-wealthy make up less than 25% of the top tax brackets.
There are just as many dumbasses and leachers among them as there are among any other broad group of society. For most, the only thing they are better at is being born into the modern aristocracy.
Most of those who have "nourished some trade or talent" were only able to do so because they were rich enough and connected enough in the first place.
Now why don't you go back and document your own claims, before calling out someone else. Your statement comparing the chances of reaching the top 5% from low income roots is not sufficient. Yes, it's easier for a person who grows up with moderate means to reach the top 5% than it is for someone who grows up in poverty. But EASIER is not the same as EASY. Kids in middle class homes who slack off through high school and college and don't learn to do anything useful might have more to fall back on when they fail, but bumming around unemployed all day long isn't going to be enough for them to live anything more than a meager existence, certainly not to become one of the wealthy "modern aristocracy" you're opposing.