Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Harvard engineers develop new manufacturing process for robotic insect hordes (harvard.edu)

KBehemoth writes: According to a press release from Harvard: "A new technique inspired by elegant pop-up books and origami will soon allow clones of robotic insects to be mass-produced by the sheet. Devised by engineers at Harvard, the ingenious layering and folding process enables the rapid fabrication of not just microrobots, but a broad range of electromechanical devices."
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft's Killer Tablet Opportunity (infoworld.com)

snydeq writes: "Advice Line's Bob Lewis sees ripe opportunity for Microsoft in the tablet market: Forget about outdoing Apple's iPad and give us the features that finally improve the way we work. 'The game isn't beating Apple at its own game. The magic buzzword is to "differentiate" and show what your technology will do that Apple won't even care about, let alone beat you at. One possible answer: Help individual employees be more effective at their jobs,' Lewis writes, outlining four business features to target, not the least of which would be to provide UI variance, enabling serious tablet users to expose the OS complexity necessary to do real work."
Space

Submission + - Who Regulates Commercial Suborbital Flight? (txchnologist.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The commercial space flight industry has plenty of problems right now, but safety apparently isn’t one of them. “Weak demand, foreign competition, financial limitations, and technical challenges seem to be more significant impediments [than safety] at the moment,” says Scott Pace, director of the Space Policy Institute at George Washington University.
Education

Submission + - NC State Agents Replaces Preschooler's Homemade Lunch with Cafeteria "Nuggets" (carolinajournal.com) 2

suraj.sun writes: A preschooler at West Hoke Elementary School ate three chicken nuggets for lunch Jan. 30 because a state employee told her the lunch her mother packed was not nutritious. The girl's turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice did not meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, according to the interpretation of the agent who was inspecting all lunch boxes in her More at Four classroom that day.

The Division of Child Development and Early Education at the Department of Health and Human Services requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs — including in-home day care centers — to meet USDA guidelines. That means lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from home.

http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/homemade-lunch-replaced-with-cafeteria-nuggets.html

Comment Re:Why quoting third-party reports? (Score 1) 269

Because /. has a anti-Chinese government bias, so they quote Falun Gong backed sites, which obviously is against the Chinese government.
I think the truth is somewhere in between what the Falun Gong has to say and what the Chinese government has to say. Both use propaganda very well. But then again all media agencies are bias in some way and either sensationalize their reports or tries to achieve a political agenda.
Now I'm not saying the Chinese government is right for abusing human rights, in fact I think the Chinese government has a long way to go in that arena. In fact it's doing really poorly and its actions should not be acceptable. However, at the same time, I AM saying Falun Gong is full of crap, and I cannot support anything they say or do. I'd support other human right activists that aren't full of crap though.

Comment Re:Yes (Score 1) 420

If you don't check it, every time in future you see the word comparable you will recognise it and what it means but will just sound odd if you read it out loud that way to someone.

This just proves my point, there is an additional mapping from the entire word "compare" to the sound for it and "able" to the sound for it. When you see it together you'll pronounce it as it were two separate words, which is odd. And this doesn't contradict the fact that you have a visual storage for initially recognizing the words. I guess I'm just saying you don't go letter by letter and sound out the word. Because if people did they'd pronounce comparable correctly every time. Comparable has no special tricks, and follows all the rules of English pronunciation (at least in American English).

Comment Re:Really? (Score 3, Interesting) 173

Why would you think that a PhD in Biological Sciences would be closely related (or even related) to one in Computer Science? Really?

The intelligence of PhDs really are Piled Higher and Deeper.

Biological Sciences have a lot of need for Computer Sciences right now. Everything from Genetics to Molecular Biology spends on staggering amounts of Statistics and CS work. I have a few friends of mine working for the National Health Institute and at Medical Schools and they all need CS and Stats background. So there is a pretty deep connect between Biology and CS right now. So yes, there is a very close relationship.

Obviously, a software firm may ask you why you got a Biological Sciences Ph.D. as opposed to a CS one, and why you are qualified. You may also get filtered out if CS is not on your resume as well. So, if you do get the Ivy Ph.D. you'll have some work cut out for you on your resume to make sure you come off the right way on paper.

Also, if you end up working for a Bio Tech, then this argument is moot, they would take a Biologist any day of the week.

Science

Submission + - The Myth of Renewable Energy (thebulletin.org)

__aaqpaq9254 writes: Excellent piece by Dawn Stover about what renewables can and can't do. The sun and wind may be practically inexhaustible, but "renewable" energy isn't. Solar, wind, and geothermal power are not fundamentally different from other energy technologies that consume finite natural resources. Good reading for anyone who thinks they know how to combat climate change.

Comment Re:Yes (Score 4, Informative) 420

And another thing: English is not my native language and I know a lot of English words I have never heard. Yet I can read them no problem. Another fact in favor of the theory in the article.

I am a native speaker and I've learned many words in writing before I learned them in speech. As a result, some of my pronunciations are nonstandard. I pronounce "comparable" as if it were "compare" + "able", even though the standard way is irregular, "comp" + "arable". I tried to pronounce these words from how they were written before I'd heard them.

I don't know why this is even up for debate. If you look at any ideogram languages, you can't just sound out each word. Especially Chinese, where there are character that sound the same but have different characters. Or even the same character can be read differently depending on context. You definitely memorized the shape. The article is definitely right that we must be storing a visual dictionary of sorts. If we had to sound out each word, then ideogram languages would have never been invented, too inefficient.

But this also doesn't mean that you don't also associate shapes to sounds. The reason you pronounce it like "compare" + "able" is because you associated the shape "compare" to its sound and "able" to its sound. When put together, it would come out as "compare" + "able". This doesn't prove that you sound out the words as you see them. However, English is a language that runs on syllables, and "compare" is a multiple syllable word, so it gets broken up in the official pronunciation of the word comparable.

Slashdot Top Deals

As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. -- Albert Einstein

Working...