Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Poor design? (Score 1) 146

It amuses me how he says:

we've designed the next wave of FAST products (scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010) to include a cross-platform search core

but immediately after that he says:

in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX

It sounds to me like one of two things happened. Either they decided to stop designing their product, or management decided that they didn't like *nix. And to think, you'd be hard pressed to find a mainstream open source app not ported to three or more platforms. Proprietary software is silly. :(

Comment Re:xvid is less demanding (Score 1) 619

I use CoreAVC (through wine) when I want to play 1080p video without having to buy a slightly newer video card.

xvid is decoded in software on the systems you mention, and that means it uses a lot of battery or mains power for this.

Well of course, I bought these systems before hardware h264 decoders were common. That doesn't make them useless. :(

I totally agree with you on AVI. MKV is a much better container format, especially if you want nice ASS subtitles or multiple soundtracks. Now, whether or not it was a good decision to remove it from HandBrake is their problem, as I don't use it anyway. :P

Comment Re:xvid is less demanding (Score 1) 619

My main box has what I consider to be a fairly recent video card, an Nvidia 7 series, but still doesn't support h.264 acceleration. I don't think the open source drivers support acceleration. My handheld certainly doesn't have any hardware acceleration, and can only really play xvid/divx at its native resolution. My Wii cannot play most h.264, but can play rather high resolution xvid. My point is, there are a lot of "underpowered" devices out there. If you're re-encoding video solely for quality, you're doing it wrong, because no matter which lossy encoding you chose it can never be as high quality as the original. I usually re-encoded video for compatibility. Size usually isn't an issue, so I try to keep things in their original encoding.

I should have mentioned earlier that I am a huge fan of h.264. I use it as much as possible and even called one of my friends an idiot for encoding his dvds with xvid, as his box is far more powerful than mine. I just don't think xvid is dead quite yet, as long as my Wii still runs.

Comment xvid is less demanding (Score 2, Insightful) 619

Xvid and divx (mpeg-4 part 2) are far less resource-intensive than h.264. I don't know if anyone's ever tried playing a reasonably sized h.264 encoded video on a PIII, but it usually doesn't work out so well. Avi and divx I'm not so sure about, but I don't see why they had to get rid of xvid. Maybe I'm behind the times, but most of the time when I decide to re-encode something it's because I need to play it on a slow budget box like the ones they have at school.

Comment PXE and USB boot (Score 1) 483

I've probably downloaded over 50 Linux ISO's in my time, but recently I've found that it's much easier to boot from the network or from a flash drive. Over half of my optical disk drives have bit the dust, and most of the disks I do burn wind up in a landfill after the first use. Plus, with network installers I don't have to download a bunch of updates right after I install. I still boot from optical media from time to time, but certainly not as much as I used to.

Comment Re:Google in simplified chinese... (Score 1) 214

I'm guessing Google censors the images by default because there aren't many Chinese language websites that actually display the controversial images, so Google doesn't associate the images with the Chinese text very well. This is just a guess, but might even explain why Bing seems to censor this. It's an unfortunate side effect of the way search engines work I suppose.

Slashdot Top Deals

6 Curses = 1 Hexahex

Working...