we've designed the next wave of FAST products (scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010) to include a cross-platform search core
but immediately after that he says:
in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX
It sounds to me like one of two things happened. Either they decided to stop designing their product, or management decided that they didn't like *nix. And to think, you'd be hard pressed to find a mainstream open source app not ported to three or more platforms. Proprietary software is silly.
Or is the a scheme to get money out of stupid geeks by driving traffic to your website?
Drive geeks to their website? Everyone knows
I use CoreAVC (through wine) when I want to play 1080p video without having to buy a slightly newer video card.
xvid is decoded in software on the systems you mention, and that means it uses a lot of battery or mains power for this.
Well of course, I bought these systems before hardware h264 decoders were common. That doesn't make them useless.
I totally agree with you on AVI. MKV is a much better container format, especially if you want nice ASS subtitles or multiple soundtracks. Now, whether or not it was a good decision to remove it from HandBrake is their problem, as I don't use it anyway.
So there you go, DivX/XviD is gone from HandBrake and it's not coming back.
So I think the confusion is justified. Does anyone know for sure exactly what is being removed from HandBrake?
My main box has what I consider to be a fairly recent video card, an Nvidia 7 series, but still doesn't support h.264 acceleration. I don't think the open source drivers support acceleration. My handheld certainly doesn't have any hardware acceleration, and can only really play xvid/divx at its native resolution. My Wii cannot play most h.264, but can play rather high resolution xvid. My point is, there are a lot of "underpowered" devices out there. If you're re-encoding video solely for quality, you're doing it wrong, because no matter which lossy encoding you chose it can never be as high quality as the original. I usually re-encoded video for compatibility. Size usually isn't an issue, so I try to keep things in their original encoding.
I should have mentioned earlier that I am a huge fan of h.264. I use it as much as possible and even called one of my friends an idiot for encoding his dvds with xvid, as his box is far more powerful than mine. I just don't think xvid is dead quite yet, as long as my Wii still runs.
over 9,000 [8.5%]
Fixed that for you, Vegeta.
6 Curses = 1 Hexahex