Of course you are right. The point I was trying to imply is that the fact that internet coming to the villages might be very good news, it is interesting to me how this emphasizes the differences between cities and the coutryside. In the article, this last paragraph cought my eye: "But our correspondent says it is not clear whether the internet revolution will reach the villages, many of which still struggle to access reliable electricity." If there are going to be investments in infrastructure, should they not include working on that too?

Now all that is left is to get them some electricity in the villages and they can all start joining slashdot.

In our datacenters we have already started to employ special airconditioning units, raised operating temperatures, redesigned floor layouts, etc. All of this to reduce power used, but not because we do not have enough power, because it is commercially attractive to say and show how "Green" our datacenters are. I suppose this can be seen as another way to prove how green you are, especially if you host services and storage and not dedicated systems.