After verifying the truthfulness of this allegations only one phrase came to my head.

GOOGLE IS EVIL

Yea! One of the things I loved about the first movie was that it was flawless about the logic. There was an absolutely logic explanation to why we see people jumping between impossible building gaps, and disappear in phone bots.
That was completely ruined at the end of the second movie with the telekinetic stuff, so unless they justify that with some-kind of a multilevel depth of matrixes, the next movies can't be nothing more than entertainment to me .

It is when you continue try to make a relation between who uses that phrase and the dumbness of who uses that phrase out of context. Since you are continually making a "correlation with causation", I'm pointing the irony of your comments. See that I'm not saying you are ironic, I'm pointing the irony of your comments.

To reach the value of an argument you can't attack the people who uses that argument as a way of reaching the real value of the argument. That's not being honest. You have to discuss the argument itself.

Based on your last phrase, perhaps it's too much to ask for you to discuss arguments rather than attacking people who use them.

Perhaps, but even considering true that most people who use that phrase are unintelligent wishing to sound intelligent, It doesn't mean that all people using that phrase are unintelligent and using the phrase out of context. To support what I'm saying: "correlation is not causation"

I believe you are wrong. The mere fact that you are intentionally using ( inherently informed consent), disqualifies jailbreak/rooting as malware.

From wikipedia: "Malware (also: scumware), short for malicious software, is software designed to secretly access a computer system without the owner's informed consent. "

The proposal is to "censor the entire net in Australia"

RTFA. It's not about flaws in encryption. It's about "ASP.NET's implementation of AES has a bug in the way that it deals with errors when the encrypted data in a cookie has been modified"
So it's the ASP.NET AES implementation that has flaws. The problem seems to be that the errors reveal enough information about how to decrypt the data.

I think that too. But perhaps a better approach would be to contact people first asking permission, don't you think. Perhaps they didn't do that because it's a little more expensive than just running a script to automatically change default passwords to cover their asses.

IANAL, Even if that is true, the router is rented, so it belongs while he pays his connection. In my country and I think in most countries, a landlord can't enter in any of his rented houses without consent of the people who live there. By your way of thinking Verizon could enter your network even if you protected it, just because they own the router.

--

Not native English speaker, so don't break my balls.

So, without an industry to fill the pockets of politicians, the country has no major incentives to uphold totally insane laws.

Yes there are plenty around to back you up. And I'm one of them. And I do a Pepsi-challenge with my code, with many out there with computer science degrees.

I agree with you about the shitty code out there. I simply can't agree with anything else you've wrote.
Why do you assume that only people with Computer Science background should be writing code? Your post also just assume that because he is a security guard, that he just should write code that would never see the light of the day. That's plain stupid you know.
The submitter already told me two thing with his article. First is that he truly loves programming, and second is that he is able to self study any language without the need of a course where he could ask many questions about issues he didn't understood.
That's more than I find in many people with a computer related education. Your computer science background can teatch you important concepts, and the right way to do things. It can be a valuable and important background. It can't teach you how to be creative with your algorithms, and how to be smart enough to write complex programs.

From the help:

I have moonlight(linux silverlight implemented with mono) installed, and looking by the requirement specifications I guess you are wrong.

Also by the obvious specs above I guess they will never support Linux, so I guess I will never know how much better it works unless I buy their OS.
I have a rule of thumb here. I don't buy proprietary software to browse the web. I'm probably crazy.