Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why did they wait until now? (Score 0) 417

Why hasn't Apple been caring about security for these past 10 years?

Yes, because as we all know, during the past 10 years Apple hasn't issued a single security patch nor have they implemented any security measures what so ever such as ASLR, DEP, or application sandboxing etc.

You know, just because you post it on slashdot doesn't make it true.

Comment Re:The opposite??? (Score 0) 417

Just about every patch cycle from apple sees more security vulnerabilities patches than are found in all MS products combined in a year.

Although this is patently false, all this proves is that Apple is better at discovering and patching vulnerabilities than Microsoft is. The total number of vulnerabilities in an OS at any one time is an unknowable figure. For all we know there are thousands of vulnerabilities in Windows and only hundreds in Mac OS. If that were the case then the fewer number of vulnerabilities found and patched by Microsoft each month would only prove that many vulnerabilities remain un-patched and the many number of vulnerabilities found and patched by Apple means that fewer vulnerabilities remain un-patched.

Therefore, because of the fact the actual total number of vulnerabilities is unknown in any one system, your metric of measurement is meaningless.

Comment Re:Great logic there Lou (Score 0) 290

You really need to do more research on IPv6

First of all, forget about NAT. There is no NAT with IPv6. NAT was a kludge to fix the problem of IPv4 addresses that actually ran out long ago.

As for VPNs, you can still have a router at the border of your network that blocks all inbound traffic to all but the services/ports that are statically routed to pass-through. The rest can be handled by a VPN if that's what you want to do.

Please tell, what's wrong with the Windows firewall, it works doesn't it? Unless you know something the rest of us don't.

Comment Re:Then has anyone decided to fork the H.264 build (Score 0) 413

Then you don't understand the horse, umm, Microsoft's statement.

"as well as VP8 video when the USER HAS INSTALLED a VP8 codec on Windows"

In other words, Microsoft is not going to prevent you from installing a plug-in to support the playback of video encoded in VP8. There is a big difference between Microsoft including support in the browser and you having to install a plug-in yourself.

Slashdot Top Deals

One possible reason that things aren't going according to plan is that there never was a plan in the first place.

Working...