Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Reason? (Score 1) 385

Give me 3 programs that are worth watching television for.

All that reality/talent show based stuff, it just confronts me with the stupid of humanity. I don't want that. And reruns of 80's/90's movies with infinite commercial breaks aren't cool either since said 80's and 90's.

Medicine

Possible Treatment For Ebola 157

RedEaredSlider writes "Researchers at the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases have found a class of drugs that could provide treatment for Ebola and Marburg hemorrhagic fever. The new drugs are called 'antisense' compounds, and they allow the immune system to attack the viruses before they can do enough damage to kill the patient. Travis Warren, research scientist at USAMRIID, said while the work is still preliminary -— the drugs have been tested only on primates — the results are so far promising. In the case of Ebola, five of eight monkeys infected with the virus lived, and with Marburg, all survived. The drugs were developed as part of a program to deal with possible bioterrorist threats, in partnership with AVI Biopharma."

Comment Someone else (Score 1) 396

From a professional tester point of view, let someone else do it. It's wise to do a developer test but actual functional testing is best done if someone else does it (a dedicated functional tester for instance). Firstly, that other person has a different perspective of the piece of software because it reads the requirements and hasn't seen the development process you as a developer did (the functional tester will press buttons differently). ;)

Secondly, you don't have to spend lots of time figuring out how and what to test. Which is more efficient as you can spend that time on developing other software. :)

More about structured testing here:
http://www.ie.sogeti.com/Resources--Downloads/Methodologies/TMap-Test-Management-Approach/

Software quality becomes more important everyday and only just recently more companies are hiring dedicated functional testers to test that, which you find a tedious task. :)

Comment Usage (Score 2, Interesting) 551

Pfff... I never like recovery discs. Every grain of personalisation is gone since the company you bought the computer from placed their wallpapers and custom themes all over the place. Even worse, the harddrive is littered with trials of virusscanners or other advertisement software. Always had that personal drive for your music? It's gone! The last recovery disc I used also 'restored' they drive mapping replacing all partitions to make it factory default again. And there is nothing you can do about it. No settings, no parameters you can set. C drive was wiped like it should, but forget about other partitions and everything on it aswell.

I HATE recovery discs. Just do it yourself by loading a boot diskette/USB/other external device and install a clean copy of your favorite OS which mostly can be ripped from the recovery disc themselves.

Comment Re:There is no time to talk about time. (Score 1) 421

It could be that it existed in one timeframe and modify things in that frame, while on the next timeframe it doesn't exist due to modifications made in previous timeframe. What happens in later timeframes is not relevant anymore. See ASCII schematic below:

We assume linear time.

Legend:
| = normal timeframe
- = spacer (to make the scheme more readable, in actuallity, timeframes are imidiately after eachother)
A = Anne (person 'a')
B = Bernard (person 'b')
/ = modified timeframe
()= original time indicator

Awesome ASCII Schematic:

B|-B|-B|-B|-AB/--/--/--/--/-(AB|AB|AB|-B/)--/--/--/--/--

So what happens in this schematic?
Bernard is there from timeframe 1 to timeframe 5. Suddenly Anne pops-up from her timemachine in timeframe 4 and kills Bernard who happend to be her grandfather. Noone knows where Anne came from.
From that point on, neither do exist due to the killing of Bernard. So the question arrises: "Who killed Bernard?". The answer is still that Anne did it. The timespace between the '(' and the ')' shows that they first were both present in those (then yet unmodified) timeframes. But at timeframe 12 Anne gets to her timemachine to kill Bernard which happens at timeframe 13 AND 5. But when Anne got back in time, timeframe 13 and up is not relevant anymore because it never existed. It did exist in reality but the future existed in the (what is now) past. There is no paradox because the past and future are in equilibrium. There are no seperate timelines because that would suggest traveling to the future which isn't theoretically possible at this time. Pun not intended.

Slashdot Top Deals

"It's the best thing since professional golfers on 'ludes." -- Rick Obidiah

Working...