Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Is Intelligent Design really (not) scientific? (Score 1) 1108

I don't have time to read it properly now (I'm at work), but the issue may be a lack of understanding of what a scientific theory actually is - that is, that it must be falsifiable. This means that a theory must make predictions that can be tested; e.g. "if I do X, I expect Y to happen". If you do X, and Y happens, then you have evidence to support the theory; if Z happens, you must either modify your theory or throw it out and look for one that does explain the observations.

Intelligent Design, as I understand it, makes no such predictions; it merely says "these things are too complex to be due to chance, therefore they aren't". The fundamental thing to understand is that even if that is correct it is not a theory in the scientific sense, and so should not be taught in science class. By all means use it to investigate evolution and attempt to demonstrate that evolution is wrong; once you succeed, come up with a new scientific theory and teach that in science class.

Comment Re:AGAIN with the prior art! (Score 1) 388

You do realise that prior art is a factor in patent cases, not copyright cases, right? The defences against being sued for copyright infringement are 1) I didn't do it, 2) it's covered by fair use*, or 3) you don't own the copyright (and/or it's in the public domain), piss off.

(* if such a thing exists in your jurisdiction; I believe that it does not here in the UK, but of course IANAL)

Comment Re:You want to stop at this dwarf star? (Score 1) 244

people used to call it decelerating, but apparently that isn't a correct term

Well, yes and no - deceleration is just the name we give to the special case of accelerating in exactly the opposite direction to your motion, such that the only (direct/intended) effect is to change the speed you're moving at.

If there's any problem at all with calling it deceleration it's that it can confuse people into thinking that there's something special about it compared to "normal" acceleration.

Comment Re:Profit vs. revenue vs. working for free (Score 1) 208

Francine Smith: You quit your job!

Stan Smith: Francine I have a chance to join the Scarlet Alliance.

Francine Smith: You mean you haven't got the job yet!

Stan Smith: Francine I'm going to be rich in adventure

Francine Smith: Rich in adventure!

[Pretends to be on the phone] Francine Smith: Hello MasterCard do you take payment in the form of adventure, hello colleges I'd like to pay my son's tuition, I don't have any money but my husband is rich in adventure!

Stan Smith: Well what'd they say.

Comment Re:Teaching the curve not the median (Score 2) 160

This used to be common in the UK, before the governments of the '70s and '80s decided that judging people based on their ability was elitist and therefore bad.

Well, my school did that back in the 80s, my daughter's school does that now in 2012, and while I could be wrong I'm pretty sure my teacher friends (2 at this sort of level) both teach in schools that do that (one in London, the other in Leeds). I know, the plural of anecdote isn't data, but I think streaming of pupils in schools is still pretty common. (There's plenty to dislike about education in the UK, but from my perspective that isn't one of the things)

Slashdot Top Deals

"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines." -- Bertrand Russell

Working...