Submission + - Cable Companiy Vs Local Broadcaster
doroshjt writes: "I haven't seen a fox broadcast in over a month. My local cable company, Time Warner, is in a contract dispute with Fox 28 out of Spokane Washington. The dispute is over payment of rebroadcasting over the air signals. Fox believes that they should be paid for their signal, time warner thinks it shouldn't be forced to pass on the buck to customers who could get the signal free OTA. http://www.timewarnercable.com/northwest/kayufaqs. html for Time Warner's side and http://www.fox28spokane.com/faq.php#gen_40 for fox's side. Who's right?"