It's ok, it's all good man.

What about "Circle Shake"? Why does it keep getting mentioned as well? It was definitely tasteless but I can't see why it keeps getting mentioned in the same context of objectification.

Everyone seems to be focussing on "Titstare" which was admittedly juvenile, sexist and potentially offensive. It may just be me, but what's the problem with "Circle Shake". It was juvenile and potentially offensive, but was it sexist? It keeps getting mentioned in the same breath but I just don't see the comparison. One was objectifying women, the other was a joke about masturbation.

You don't have to vote to avoid a fine, you only have to attend a polling place and get your name crossed off. There's no requirement for you to actually cast a ballot.

Below The Line is a great resource to remember next time around too.

They've already back-pedalled on this policy faster than Tony Abbott walking into a gay bathhouse.

"Williams notes that from the Government Accountability Office found that only 20 percent of patent litigation was brought by so-called trolls."

That frankly surprises me, I would've thought it was higher.

Out of 10+ drops last night (120+ players, or 110+ if I don't include myself in the ten drops) I saw 3 people using 3PV. Anecdotal evidence only, and I'd be in a higher player bracket but still....

Hundreds of players,out of a player base of at least tens of thousands. If you look at the original amount of money raised and assume that most people bought one of the top 2 tiers then there were at least 50,000 players at launch and probably a lot more now.

There's a definite negative agenda behind the original summary and article. The bulk of the community ARE happy with the changes and have continued to play. It's only a vocal minority that have screamed at the top of their lungs for attention, I sat in (online) on a couple of #saveMWO meetings and apart from a few well considered opinions the bulk of the talk was whining/specualtion about things that hadn't happened yet or were basically untrue.

"Grossly exaggerating" the power of "media barons", think about that for a second. Think about what you just wrote.

Murdoch vs Microsoft, IMHO Murdoch is worse. At least Microsoft isn't actively trying to subvert political processes through media control.

I wonder if the people of the US are ever going to rise up, or if it just gets much worse before it gets better.

Most of the arguments I've seen so far haven't been "Is what they are doing legal?", instead the arguments have been "Is what they are doing right?"

As a geek, you only watch Star Trek:Enterprise to complain about:

1. How Scott Bakula killed the franchise (untrue, so people really think Trek will stay dead?).

2. How under-rated it was (wrong, it was rated exactly where it should be, just your opinion is different).

3. How tired Star Trek is now (possibly true)