But those few square kilometers that we miss to cover will spontaneously catch fire when all warming have to flee to them.

" 67% said the complexity of malware is a chief factor; 67% said the volume of malware attacks; and 58% cited the ineffectiveness of anti-malware solutions."

And the remaining 40% said these numbers don't add upp.

There's desert farming concepts that use evaporation of seawater and condensation to provide freshwater to plants for no huge extra water cost.

But clearly that have to be impossible because we're supposed to starve from overpopulation and be generally miserable because that's how the environmentalists want it.

Just teach your kids to touch that other one while yelling "you can't touch me back or I tell the teachers!"

And then teach them Newton III to use in defence if the teachers are cunts("well your honor, technically we both touched eachother at the same time")

It's also a way to potentially slow down bug solving. You write the patch and just before you hit submit, you realize "Oh wait, I could get paid for this" so you create a $1 bribe for said bug, wait until it have some dollars more, then submit and cash out.

It might even lead to more bugs appearing in the software. If there's some 1000 bugs you know because you added some willfully sloppy code, there's obviously money to be made.

Want more features? Well think of it like DLC. Oh they're ready all right but I'm waiting for the bribe request.

Some men just wants to see the world burn.
Who cares about what world and when.

"the charming ideas guy" is a derogatory term in my book. It represents the hopeless idiot that have his idea of the new facebook/WoW/sliced bread and looks for someone to work for free to help him make it.

The cooperation will last approximately a week because the idea guys doesn't have a clue about any technical detail or the process required to fulfil a fraction of his ideas.

And there's like a billion of these morons.

What drives tech progress is competence and ideas.

Well if it's a spiky ice hell, then no wonder they told them not to attempt landing as that would only end in tears.

Send a nuke as a landing zone herald.
And pray to your diety of choice that 2001 wasn't made in correspondence with aliens.

Gunpowder tea

Hydrogen gas is quite safe, if a tank is just punctured, it will remove itself harmlessly from the vicinity.
If the tank is ruptured and the gas set on fire, you might set a tree overhang on fire, but the car will avoid most of the damage. Unlike gas that pools under the car in a manner perfect for human BBQ.

Given their criminal abuse of the written word that sounds that sounds like a reasonable punishment.
I mean for fucks flying sake, we have Swype and full phone keyboards, STT and probably thought reading touchtyping too, and they still use deprecated SMS shorthand.

No wonder the other girl killed herself if that's how their messages looked like.

The problem with the ITER approach is that the commercial reactor types based on it will cost too much to compete with traditional nuclear and coal. As It's based on a GIGANTIC no-financial-holds-barred approach.

The smaller approaches like LPP, General fusion, TriAlpha and whatever they're called nowdays that have shoestring to moderate budget will likely not only succeed to produce viable fusion energy sooner, they'll do so much cheaper too.

I came here expecting a lot of dumb arguments and comments from Murricans and I was not disappointed.

I see the anti-nuclear camp blending fire detectors and dusting them all over the place to ensure Fukushima is "taken as seriously as it deserves!"