Claiming credit is not a predicate for receiving a reward. The reward in such a case may simply be feeling good about yourself. Don't confuse that with altruism.
Assume my income is high enough that I'm not only paying for the services I receive but that I'm also paying extra. Please explain to me how I'm not being forced to be charitable - and while you're at it, explain to me what ultimately happens if I refuse to 'donate' this extra amount. You've got the most creative use of the word 'disincentivized' of anyone I've ever seen.
Semantics aside, this report is actually pretty cool.
The government has the right to regulate light bulbs because the use of electricity has very significant negative externalities, which no one is paying for.?
See topic.
What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.