Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why not block all unverified POTS spoofing? (Score 1) 202

Great idea, as soon as the phone companies allow this I'll be first to implement it. If cable TV can force me to buy their stupid package to live-stream a cable news channel from the web (and enforce it), then a phone company should be able to verify I'm paying for the specific number I'm sending as my caller ID name.

Comment Re:Why not block all unverified POTS spoofing? (Score 5, Interesting) 202

I work in an inbound-only call center (tech support for web host). If we call a client back, we spoof our number so the number they see on their caller ID is the same toll free number they called to reach us in the first place. We used to not do this, and every outbound call looked like it came from somewhere in Colorado (we're in Oklahoma), so it helped our customers in more than one way. First, they recognize it's us calling them back about their ticket, and two, they can call the number they saw on caller ID and reach us again. Previously the Colorado local number they saw went nowhere, it was just some bulk trunk line owned by Verizon and leased by our call ACD routing cloud software company. I'd argue it was worse for our clients when we couldn't spoof. They had no idea who was calling them, they get dead-air if they tried to call it back. Having said that, I'm sick of death of getting these "looks local" telemarketing recorded sales pitches, so much that I essentially treat phone calls like email now: safe senders only. If you aren't in my address book head of time, my phone doesn't even ring anymore. It's insane. I must get 3 a day.

Comment Re:This is not helpful (Score 1) 327

I've wondered if the minimum should be tied to inflation so you keep the same buying power. That is, regardless of inflation, your salary will always get you the same number of loafs of bread or such. But clearly that isn't a single shot solution, since as you said the cost of living in (say) San Francisco is wildly different than Nowhere, OK.

Comment Re:More control for Google? (Score 5, Informative) 85

On Windows, if you have UAC enabled, you'll be asked if you want to let the installer elevate. But if you say "no" on that prompt, it will install without creating system services (since the installer never received the privilege escalation to do so). This is also how non-admins can install it on a per-user basis.

Comment Re:Old news (Score 1) 233

Agree. Most of it is the cool factor. I honestly can't off the top of my head think of anything Siri does that I can't with default voice search beyond querying/adding calendar events. Asking questions gives me results with Google, and if really wanted to have those read back to me I could use Vlingo. I can't ask "where can I get a sandwich", but I can tell Google Voice Search "nearby restaurants" and it gives me a map with pushpins marking them. That's honestly better than Siri to me.

Comment Re:In this case, Size Does Matter (Score 4, Interesting) 233

My old Windows Mobile 5.x phone going on 8 or 9 years ago was able to use voice to "Play X artist" or "What's my next appointment" (still can't do that on Android),... and WinMo didn't even require a server connection to translate my voice into text. It could even respond to you. Say "Play music", it would ask "what do you want to play? By album, artist, genre, or shuffle?" You could even continue the conversation, just like Siri, by saying "what artists are available?" or something similar.

The only time a connection of any kind was required was if my request spawned a web search or geolocation process, which would be a normal webpage or map loading. I don't see why Apple needs "a huge data center" to handle these requests.

Slashdot Top Deals

"A car is just a big purse on wheels." -- Johanna Reynolds

Working...