Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not a new idea - and 24 nm, not 12 nm (Score 1) 332

UNCLOS Article 33 states:

1. In a zone contiguous to its territorial sea, described as the contiguous zone, the coastal State may exercise the control necessary to:
(a) prevent infringement of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations within its territory or territorial sea;
(b) punish infringement of the above laws and regulations committed within its territory or territorial sea.,
2. The contiguous zone may not extend beyond 24 nautical miles from the baselines from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured.

Essentially, the 12 to 24 NM area is a "hot pursuit zone". Earning a wage 12.1NM from shore is perfectly legal.

Comment Re:Not a new idea (Score 2) 332

In 2010, there were 298,187 B1 and B2 visas granted to Indian nationals, 508,968 to Chinese ones, 83k to Philippines etc., for a total of 3.68M B1/B2 visas - http://www.travel.state.gov/xls/FY10NIVDetailTable.xls

Since an individual needs a US visa to get to San Francisco in order to board the Blueseed vessel, they'll be able to come back on shore as long as they spend less than 180 days a year on the mainland.

In case of severe storm or other emergency, the ship can come to shore under force majeure and preserve its jurisdiction, which will be an open registry state like Malta or The Bahamas.

Comment We've done some homework... (Score 1) 332

Regrettably, the OP didn't include a link to our FAQ, which would have cleared up many concerns.

We'll be anchored 12 nautical miles (22 km) offshore. The water depth is around 250ft, as can be seen on Google Earth.

For internet connectivity, we'll be using solutions similar to the Ubiquity Solution radios and antennas - range 75km, bandwidth 150Mbps per combo. Satellite backup from Skycasters (6Mbps/1.5Mbps) is only $100/mo as long as your main line is up.

One of the accommodation barges we're thinking of is 190m x 45m.

SwedishChef, given your experience, we're definitely interested in your constructive input. Drop us a line if you'd like at http://blueseed.co/contact-us.html

Comment We have an FAQ (Score 1) 332

"Why not telecommute" is a good question, which we address in our FAQ - http://www.blueseed.co/faq.html#silicon_valley, http://www.blueseed.co/faq.html#telepresence

Incidentally, since you mention Vancouver,

In November 2011, ABC News reported on the story of Amit Aharoni, an Israeli startup entrepreneur who, after creating 9 American jobs, received a letter from the US Citizenship and Immigration Serice (USCIS) denying his visa request and notifying him to leave the country immediately. Aharoni left for Vancouver and tried to run his company (an online cruise booking service) remotely via Skype. That didn't quite work out, so he set to work on making his story public. After ABC World News picked up the story, USCIS reversed their decision within 24 hours. The moral is that running a startup remotely can be big enough of a pain to warrant mounting a media campaign, and that unless they manage to attract massive media attention, a startup entrepreneur without a valid visa may have to relocate their operations outside of the U.S.

Idle

Submission + - Optical Speedbumps Create Illusion of Little Girl (popsci.com) 1

An anonymous reader writes: Civil authorities around the world have tried all kinds of tricks to get drivers to slow down: speed bumps, rumble strips, flashing lights, the decoy police cruiser, and of course the good old-fashioned speed trap. The British Columbia Automobile Association Traffic Safety Foundation is taking a different tack: scaring the living hell out of drivers. In an effort to brusquely remind drivers of the consequences of wanton acceleration, they’re painting an elongated image of a child chasing a ball into the street in 2-D on the pavement in such a way that it appears three-dimensional.
Privacy

Submission + - Court OKs Warrantless Cell-Site Tracking (wired.com) 1

Tootech writes: A federal appeals court said Tuesday the government may obtain cell-site information that mobile phone carriers retain on their customers without a probable-cause warrant under the Fourth Amendment.

The decision by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was not, however, an outright Obama administration victory. Lower courts, the three-judge panel wrote, could demand the government show probable cause — the warrant standard — before requiring carriers to release such data to the feds.

The opinion does leaves the privacy issue in a legal limbo of sorts. The standard by which the government can access such records — which can be used in criminal prosecutions — is left to the whims of district court judges. Historical cell-site location information, which carriers usually retain for about 18 months, identifies the cell tower to which the customer was connected at the beginning of a call and at the end of the call

Lower courts across the country have issued conflicting rulings on the topic and will continue to do so without appellate guidance or congressional action. The Philadelphia-based court was the first appeals court to address the issue.

The Obama administration argued a judge could force a carrier to produce cell-site data on a showing that the information was “relevant and material” to an investigation.

But the appeals court, ruling in a narcotics case, said the Stored Communications Act, the law in question, was vague as to what standard was required.

The court left open the possibility that it would revisit the case again and decide whether the constitution requires a warrant for the cell site data. The court said the statute itself could be interpreted as not requiring one

Slashdot Top Deals

Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system. If there's anything special we can do for you, anything at all, don't hesitate to ask!

Working...