Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:go! (Score 1) 834

I've interviewed many a candidate with a strong academic background (masters, perhaps some PhD work), little to zero experience, and what showed up in the interview: little to zero comprehension of the issues that would be important on the job. I've also interviewed candidates with weak academic backgrounds (uncompleted undergrads) but a few years of experience, and what showed up in the interview: they had the ability to listen and learn, and were interested in the job because of their own passion (versus feeling that their degree made it the only option).

I'm not saying a degree makes one unqualified, of course... I'm just saying that an unqualified statement such as As someone without any education at all, I'd say go for the Masters, then get your experience after that. No? really doesn't look at any relevant issues.

Comment Re:File a police report _now_. (Score 2) 931

> If no response happens, leave it the hell alone and get the hell out as soon as possible.
That's the worst advice one could follow. If you don't care, to the point that you'll just walk away, don't even bother to "question the situation politely and in firm terms", just cave in from the start.

If you're not willing to stand up for yourself, either the situation isn't important to you or you don't deserve better than what you're receiving. If a mugger points a gun at you and demands your wallet, give it to them -- if you don't, you'll lose more than your wallet. If a person in authority oversteps their bounds, protest to the furthest legal extent that you can. If you don't, you won't bring attention to the problem and thus you only contribute towards making things worse.

Comment Re:Ouch (Score 1) 849

From a friend of mine, his story went something like this:

My friend had been pulled over for what he felt was something bogus...
Friend: Is it illegal for me to call you an asshole?
Cop: Yes.
Friend: Is it illegal for me to think you're an asshole?
Cop: No.
Friend: I think you're an asshole.

-----

Different story, from my youth... a rent-a-cop was hassling me over some nonsense, when I was driving into the US Army-controlled area I worked in at the time.
Me: Were you born an asshole, or did you work at it your whole life?
Rent-a-cop: Wait right there //call's MPs//

-----

Moral of the stories: Telling the truth can get you in trouble. So can asking questions.

Comment Re:Effect on Qt Solutions (e.g. SOAP) (Score 1) 828

It's a fair assumption that it might open QT Solutions up.

Related... I've got a Qt developer's license and I never purchased Qt Solutions. I recently discovered that Nokia has decided to retroactively give Qt Solutions to anyone with a developer license.

Comment Re:Why can't I use my hardware? (Score 1) 453

They're not trying to lock people out of their hardware, though that's the perspective of tech geeks (like myself) who want the freedom to mix and match technologies until we build our perfect setup.

What they are trying to do is lock people into their hardware. Their intent is to get people (in volumes that far outwight the tech geek population) to use their product and then find themselves inconvenienced should they later decide to upgrade to competing products. If they can make it more convenient for Joe Consumer's next purchase to be one of their own products rather than what another company offers, they secure their own financial future. Joe Consumer isn't looking that far down the road and isn't planning to use the product in a manner exceeding the manufacturer's expectations, so Joe Consumer makes his purchase without considering these issues.
The Courts

Judge Tells RIAA To Stop 'Bankrupting' Litigants 332

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "The Boston judge who has consolidated all of the RIAA's Massachusetts cases into a single case over which she has been presiding for the past 5 years delivered something of a rebuke to the RIAA's lawyers, we have learned. At a conference this past June, the transcript of which (PDF) has just been released, Judge Nancy Gertner said to them that they 'have an ethical obligation to fully understand that they are fighting people without lawyers ... to understand that the formalities of this are basically bankrupting people, and it's terribly critical that you stop it ...' She also acknowledged that 'there is a huge imbalance in these cases. The record companies are represented by large law firms with substantial resources,' while it is futile for self-represented defendants to resist. The judge did not seem to acknowledge any responsibility on her part, however, for having created the 'imbalance,' and also stated that the law is 'overwhelmingly on the side of the record companies,' even though she seems to recognize that for the past 5 years she has been hearing only one side of the legal story."

Slashdot Top Deals

"You need tender loving care once a week - so that I can slap you into shape." - Ellyn Mustard

Working...